Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United Arab Emirates firm to operate six major U.S. ports
www.worldtribune.com/ ^ | Monday, February 13, 2006

Posted on 02/13/2006 1:11:06 PM PST by Esther Ruth

United Arab Emirates firm to operate six major U.S. ports

SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM Monday, February 13, 2006 WASHINGTON — The Bush administration has approved a deal in which a United Arab Emirates company would operate six major ports in the United States.

A U.S. government panel has determined that the UAE firm, DP World, would not endanger national security. DP World, based in Dubai, has offered $6.8 billion for the purchase of a British firm that operates the ports of Baltimore, Miami, New York, New Jersey, New Orleans and Philadelphia.

DP World intends to acquire the London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation [P&O] Co. The sale was expected to be approved on Monday.

"The P&O directors have withdrawn their recommendation of the offer by PSA, which was announced on Jan. 26, 2006, and unanimously recommend that P&O Stockholders vote in favor of the revised proposals at the meetings, which are now scheduled to take place on Feb. 13," DP World said in a statement.

The company said the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States "thoroughly reviewed the potential transaction and concluded they had no objection." The committee includes representatives from the departments of Treasury, Defense, Justice, Commerce, State and Homeland Security.

The United Arab Emirates has been described as a leading military ally of the United States. In 2005, the UAE acquired the first 10 of 80 F-16E/F Block 60 multi-role fighters in a $6.4 billion purchase.

But officials said the UAE has not fully responded to repeated appeals from the Treasury Department to halt money-laundering activities exploited by Al Qaida and aligned groups. They said that for years Dubai served as a base for Al Qaida operatives, including those who destroyed the World Trade Center and a Pentagon wing in 2001.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldtribune.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arab; emirates; ports; uae; united; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2006 1:11:08 PM PST by Esther Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

excerpt

"America's busiest ports are vital to our economy and to the international economy, and that is why they remain top terrorist targets," Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat, said. "Just as we would not outsource military operations or law enforcement duties, we should be very careful before we outsource such sensitive homeland security duties."


2 posted on 02/13/2006 1:11:38 PM PST by Esther Ruth (I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee - Genesis 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Sad, what's happening to my country, BTTT.


3 posted on 02/13/2006 1:12:35 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

From the other day
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1576547/posts
Company From United Arab Emirates Poised to Oversee Six American Ports Due to Sale
AP/YahooNews ^ | 2-11-06 | Ted Bridis


Posted on 02/11/2006 11:11:33 AM CST by STARWISE


A company in the United Arab Emirates is poised to take over significant operations at six American ports as part of a corporate sale, leaving a country with ties to the Sept. 11 hijackers with influence over a maritime industry considered vulnerable to terrorism.


The Bush administration considers the UAE an important ally in the fight against terrorism since the suicide hijackings and is not objecting to Dubai Ports World's purchase of London-based Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co.


The $6.8 billion sale is expected to be approved Monday. The British company is the fourth largest ports company in the world and its sale would affect commercial U.S. port operations in New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, New Orleans, Miami and Philadelphia.


DP World said it won approval from a secretive U.S. government panel that considers security risks of foreign companies buying or investing in American industry.


(Excerpt) Read more at biz.yahoo.com ...


4 posted on 02/13/2006 1:12:55 PM PST by Esther Ruth (I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee - Genesis 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

well, when the iranian nuke is smuggled into a US port - at least we know where to look to see whom AQ compromised to bring it in.


5 posted on 02/13/2006 1:13:21 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Appears similar to previous threads. Why not combine them?


6 posted on 02/13/2006 1:13:31 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
"...the purchase of a British firm that operates the ports of Baltimore, Miami, New York, New Jersey, New Orleans and Philadelphia."

This is wrong. They have their own business operations in those ports, they do not operate or in any way control the ports.

7 posted on 02/13/2006 1:13:33 PM PST by CWOJackson (Tancredo? Wasn't he the bounty hunter in Star Wars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Sad?
What the heck is this - foreigners handling our ports???

****

A U.S. government panel has determined that the UAE firm, DP World, would not endanger national security. DP World, based in Dubai, has offered $6.8 billion for the purchase of a British firm that operates the ports of Baltimore, Miami, New York, New Jersey, New Orleans and Philadelphia.
8 posted on 02/13/2006 1:14:55 PM PST by Esther Ruth (I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee - Genesis 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

"
"America's busiest ports are vital to our economy and to the international economy, and that is why they remain top terrorist targets," Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat, said. "Just as we would not outsource military operations or law enforcement duties, we should be very careful before we outsource such sensitive homeland security duties.""

You might as well go ahead and shoot me. I actually agree with Chuck Schumer on something.


9 posted on 02/13/2006 1:15:09 PM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma

These foreign companies are just doing the work that no American companies want to do, right?


10 posted on 02/13/2006 1:15:53 PM PST by Printing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
trying to picture a bunch of longshoreman being asked to pray to Allah 5 times a day as part of their next union contract negotiation.

BBWWAHAHAHAHAhahahahaha

11 posted on 02/13/2006 1:16:03 PM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
A U.S. government panel has determined that the UAE firm, DP World, would not endanger national security.

Why THANK you! I feel SO much better now.

12 posted on 02/13/2006 1:16:35 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Printing

Don't get me started....


13 posted on 02/13/2006 1:17:12 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

great.. just great


14 posted on 02/13/2006 1:17:34 PM PST by The Mayor ( Check out my site http://www.rusthompson.com/HomeImprovementandRemodelingTips.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Appears similar to previous threads. Why not combine them?
***

Let's not and say we did. Went up Saturday at 11 am-ish and only 70 posts. You don't think this is a big deal maybe?
15 posted on 02/13/2006 1:17:46 PM PST by Esther Ruth (I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee - Genesis 12:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor

The UAE is a "boycotted country" according to our government so we cannot sell them anything without a lot of additional paperwork.


16 posted on 02/13/2006 1:18:55 PM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
"Let's not and say we did. Went up Saturday at 11 am-ish and only 70 posts. You don't think this is a big deal maybe?"

The other article is a little more informative...in particular in specifically states that they will in no way control the ports, simply their own business operations within those ports. This article is misleading.

17 posted on 02/13/2006 1:19:57 PM PST by CWOJackson (Tancredo? Wasn't he the bounty hunter in Star Wars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

"A U.S. government panel has determined that the UAE firm, DP World, would not endanger national security."

Translation: Government officials and cronies are going to get wealthy on this. Long term security or doing the right thing are beyond their scope.

I'm disgusted.


18 posted on 02/13/2006 1:20:45 PM PST by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
"I actually agree with Chuck Schumer on something."

I don't. It makes me suspicious, especially since he said he didn't know all the details of this whole thing on Fox today. The arabs will have nothing to do with security. We won't be outsourcing our security. It's probably just another lefty shake-down.

19 posted on 02/13/2006 1:20:54 PM PST by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth
only 70 posts

Evidently not considered a big deal.

20 posted on 02/13/2006 1:22:43 PM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson