No, what I'm making light of is the attitude of some Freepers that if you don't agree with them on every issue, then you aren't a conservative. That's a ludicrous view, but one held by some Freepers none the less.
If you choose to voice support for nanny statist legislation such as this
LOL No, what I'm supporting is protecting women from the creepy guys that need to get mail order brides.
In my first post to you, I challenged your commitment to Conservatism based upon your support of this leftist-sponsored legislation.
Since then, you've had several opportunities to change my mind and you have squandered every one.
LOL
This last comment from you in particular has me laughing as well.
what I'm supporting is protecting women from the creepy guys that need to get mail order brides.
I can't fathom anyone short of MurryMom utilizing such leftist, feminazi spin to justify her opinion. (somewhere in the distance we can still hear hillary chanting, "It's for the children.")
LOL
But being the forgiving sort that I am, I'm going to provide you with one last opportunity to redeem yourself.
This is a link to an on line copy of our United States Constitution.
Show me where our Founding Fathers authorized the federal government to enact legislation that empowers the fedgov to protect foreign nationals from United States citizens in matters such as this.
Any response to me which does not include a logical justification for this law based on Constitutional principles will be viewed as a complete failure on your part to prove that:
1) this law is Constitutional;
2) you even have a clue what it means to be a Conservative.