Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats blast Cheney secrecy after shooting [Clinton, Reid, Schumer.....]
Yahoo ^

Posted on 02/14/2006 5:33:47 PM PST by Sub-Driver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: wbcoleman
The handling has made the Administration a laughingstock.

Depends what they were handling.

The delay may have been very wise and worth the minor fuss over the style.

41 posted on 02/14/2006 6:25:53 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Hillary's husband shot a woman in the face in the Oval Office and lied about it.


42 posted on 02/14/2006 6:27:20 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
hmmm---speaking of 'coming clean and leveling with the American people' ...click here

43 posted on 02/14/2006 6:29:10 PM PST by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Your headline would have been perfect it you would have left out the [ ] brackets. LOL

"Democrats blast Cheney secrecy after shooting Clinton,Reid, Schumer".

44 posted on 02/14/2006 6:32:01 PM PST by fish hawk (creatio ex nihilo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Has Schumer ever acknowledged or apologized for the stealing (not inadverant) of Michael Steeles credit history?


45 posted on 02/14/2006 6:40:29 PM PST by Flifuss (SCE to Aux.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Vince Foster must have realized it at the end of his life.


46 posted on 02/14/2006 6:44:01 PM PST by weegee (We are all Danes now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Depends what they were handling.

As long as they weren't handling illegal campaign contributions from the Chinese Communists.

47 posted on 02/14/2006 6:46:40 PM PST by EricT. ("I reject your reality and substitute my own."-Adam Savage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

These guys are really screwballs. It beats the heck out of me trying to figure out how anyone can think ex-President Clinton can be anything but a scum sleazeball.


48 posted on 02/14/2006 6:50:26 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Made in USA
The media will be eating crow for many months or even years after they are exposed

You're assuming they have some type of humility.

49 posted on 02/14/2006 6:53:55 PM PST by eyespysomething (Iran is like the slightly retarded cousin that keeps asking Santa for a shotgun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Has Mrs. Clinton forgotten the poor guy she had her secret service run over because she was late; and never stopped to see if he was alright?

I believe Vice-President Cheney did a heck of a lot more.


50 posted on 02/14/2006 6:56:44 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Unbelievable. We're paying these clowns for this?


51 posted on 02/14/2006 6:59:37 PM PST by denydenydeny ("Osama... made the mistake of confusing media conventional wisdom with reality" (Mark Steyn))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EricT.
As long as they weren't handling illegal campaign contributions from the Chinese Communists.

Exactly.

Whatever the circumstances, it was managed, a plan was devised and information was released.

A plan, leading to the temporary label of laughingstock, imposed by questionable critics, may have been an acceptable risk to its authors.

52 posted on 02/14/2006 7:00:42 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: eyespysomething

If Whittington is healthy enough, he should make a statement now that the media are acting like ghouls. No one will care if he says it in two weeks.


53 posted on 02/14/2006 7:01:34 PM PST by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Don't know about anyone else but these democrats and the media are digging a grave out here in hunting country. It's sad enough to have a hunting accident but as these idiots try to make political hay from the event is, in the words of Dasshole, deeply saddening.......

But I hope they keep it up to show the country and world what true asses they are......

54 posted on 02/14/2006 7:08:15 PM PST by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
Hipaa Law

Effective April 14, 2003, new federal regulations require us to be even more vigilant in safeguarding the privacy and confidentiality of our patients’ medical conditions.

Condition reports

Under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, known as HIPAA, we may release information about the condition of a patient only if the inquiry specifically contains the patient’s name. If the patient has not requested that information be withheld, and the request for information contains the patient’s name, we will generally be able to release the patient’s condition. However, we will do so in general terms that do not communicate specific medical information. Below are the one-word descriptions we will be able to provide:

• Undetermined
• Good
• Fair
• Serious
• Critical

A description of the nature of a patient’s accident or injuries in the past, this is not permissible under HIPAA without written authorization from the patient. Additionally, patients have the option of requesting that we disclose no information about them or even confirm their presence in the hospital.

55 posted on 02/14/2006 7:12:02 PM PST by navysealdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains

Cheney press statement-"OOPS".


56 posted on 02/14/2006 7:16:59 PM PST by csmusaret (Urban Sprawl is an oxymoron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: navysealdad
Good point.

I have no reason to be informed of the events in the private life of the Vice President if it has no direct bearing on his ability to effectively and honorably conduct the affairs of his elected office.

57 posted on 02/14/2006 7:25:10 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I hope they keep this up. They just don't know to NOT dig themselves deeper in the hole.


58 posted on 02/14/2006 7:28:27 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; All

TOTAL BS

BTW is there not a new MEDICAL PRIVACY law?

Something that prevents government workers (like a VP) from disclosing a person's medical information?


59 posted on 02/14/2006 7:29:08 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
So tiring. Do these people do anything except complain?

Yes they do. When they are not doing anything productive, they cash their paychecks; paid by working Americans.

60 posted on 02/14/2006 7:35:20 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson