To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Check post #35. Per the regs, the 1.50 was a "must have" and Airbus tried to go with no margin over that. So they failed with "no margin" per spec.
I understand what you're saying, but there is more than one margin in play here.
Yep, they'll need to design, build, and test a whole new fuselage/wing assembly... Poor Airbus... heh.
109 posted on
02/17/2006 7:54:49 AM PST by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: Frank_Discussion
Concur. Regardless of the spin, Airbus failed to meet the 1.50 goal.
Further, they decided to go with "design per computer" right to that limit.
118 posted on
02/18/2006 2:13:24 AM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Frank_Discussion
138 posted on
02/23/2006 12:32:30 AM PST by
globalheater
(There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare - Sun Tzu)
To: Frank_Discussion
139 posted on
02/23/2006 12:32:31 AM PST by
globalheater
(There is no instance of a country having benefited from prolonged warfare - Sun Tzu)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson