Careful, most evolutionists I've read would then make a leap in logic to conclude most evolutionists most evolutionists consider homosexuality acceptable and then assert their conclusions were scientifically founded.
No, they wouldn't, because most evolutionists aren't that incompetent with statistics, but thanks for sharing yet more false assertions with us.
Why is it that some people on these threads always assume that if you don't take creationism seriously that you must be a Godless atheist? These people do science, and conservatism, a disservice.
Reread the post. I'm not aware I made any false assertion. Since I have no reason to doubt your veracity other than my personal experince, please provide a list of all the evolutionists I have read, then annotate which ones would make such a leap in logic, quantify that number of evolutionists and compare to the number of evolutionists I have read who would not make such a leap in logic, to justify your conclusion.
Unless of course you have found the evolutionist method of argument, to simply call other beliefs as false assertions to be more veritable.