Why not Mike? ;-)
"If Fox wanted to promote Liberalism, it would have chosen an articulate and attractive spokesperson for liberalism. Instead he chose ineffective liberals."
Just who would an "effective" liberal be? I didn't know there were any.
Why not Mike? ;-)
Do you really think Larry King is ineffective? Do you think Wolfe Blitzer is ineffective?
Were walter Cronkite, Peter Jennings, and Tom Brokaw ineffective?
Do you really think Matt Lauer and Katie Couric are ineffective?
Some of the most effective over the years were the hosts of 60 minutes. Does Barbara Walters and Hugh Downs come to mind? Did I mention Tim Russert?
There are a few hundred others in the media.
The most important characteristic of a political analyst it to be able to look at the world the way it is.. not the way we wish it were. If the left did not have effective representation in the media it would never win an election.
Until talk radio became legal and Fox Cable News went on the air, there were no effective right wing media people.. those that supported the left got 99.9 percent of the air time. Their was only one unbiased reporter .. that was Paul Harvey. He was limited to one radio newscast a day... Good Day!!!