Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Dakota Abortion Bill Passed
Fox News

Posted on 02/22/2006 2:49:16 PM PST by Tim Long

The South Dakota Senate just passed a bill that bans almost all abortions in the state. It now goes to the governor to be signed.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: abortion; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Tim Long

YIPPEE!!!


29 posted on 02/22/2006 2:57:38 PM PST by Hoodat ( Silly Dems, AYBABTU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

Should be a very interesting case when it gets to court.


30 posted on 02/22/2006 2:57:55 PM PST by Centurion2000 ("If you're going to shoot somebody, Shoot! Don't talk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long; 4lifeandliberty; AbsoluteGrace; afraidfortherepublic; Alamo-Girl; anniegetyourgun; ...

Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping!

Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping list...

31 posted on 02/22/2006 2:58:00 PM PST by cgk (I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

YIPPEE!!!


32 posted on 02/22/2006 2:58:04 PM PST by Hoodat ( Silly Dems, AYBABTU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

I think that's enough already.


33 posted on 02/22/2006 2:58:08 PM PST by Xenalyte (Can you count, suckas? I say the future is ours . . . if you can count.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Stop Spamming


34 posted on 02/22/2006 2:58:19 PM PST by COEXERJ145 (Pat Buchanan lost a family member in the holocaust. The man fell out of a guard tower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

I wish this would be the end of it. But the tyrants in robes will strike it down.

Much like the "judge" in CA who stopped the execution yesterday.


35 posted on 02/22/2006 2:59:16 PM PST by rom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Sorry about that, everyone. My screen got stuck, so I clicked on [post] several times. My deepest apologies.


36 posted on 02/22/2006 2:59:43 PM PST by Hoodat ( Silly Dems, AYBABTU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Thou shalt not Spam.


37 posted on 02/22/2006 2:59:45 PM PST by tiredoflaundry (I'll admit it , I'm a Snow Flake !(Snoq) The rest of my tagline redacted by court order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

Sorry about that, everyone. My screen got stuck, so I clicked on [post] several times. My deepest apologies.


38 posted on 02/22/2006 2:59:53 PM PST by Hoodat ( Silly Dems, AYBABTU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long

Does it exclude cases of rape and incest?


39 posted on 02/22/2006 3:00:10 PM PST by proudofthesouth (Mao said that power comes at the point of a rifle; I say FREEDOM does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandEagle

It has to go through the appropriate legal channels first though. It's not like this will be appealed, argued, and ruled on at the Supreme Court level within a week. An injunction will be in place immediately but a ruling from the High Court would most likely take several years. By the time it's appealed either through the Federal district courts or the State courts and makes its way to the Supreme Court the makeup may be different than it is now. It's not unlikely one or two justices (most likely Ginsburg and Stevens) will retire within 2-3 years.

Remember also if the Supreme Court isn't in a favorable configuration South Dakota doesn't have to appeal up to the court for a precedent reaffirming setback. This seems like a positioning move, a set up for a challenge to the fundamental holding of Roe years later.


40 posted on 02/22/2006 3:00:33 PM PST by Nova442 ("Cry Havoc and let slip the Dogs of War.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson