Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
In my reading of neo-conservative philosophy and development, they are defined by foreign policy views and objectives. It would make sense that they would be less concerned with domestics issues such as government size and spending than a traditional conservative though. But so are moderates less concerned about these issues, which doesn't make them neo-cons.
68 posted on 02/28/2006 9:33:45 PM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Dolphy
It would make sense that they would be less concerned with domestics issues such as government size and spending than a traditional conservative though.

They are "less concerned with domestic issues" because they'd be laughed out of conservative circles if they made public statements on them. As others have pointed out on this thread (and I posted a direct quote in Post #20 that supports this), these so-called "neo-conservatives" were historically Marxists. It has often been said that "neo-con" is used as an anti-semitic slur of sorts, but that's not the case at all. The fact that so many of them are Jewish isn't the fault of a hard-core, principled conservative who despises their political leanings, though the fact remains that Jewish Americans make up a disproportionate share of them. But this isn't a mere coincidence. The simple truth is that almost every one of these high-profile neo-conservatives can be traced back to a Marxist political philosophy that was popular among the well-educated upper crust of most urban centers in the northeastern U.S. over the last 50 years.

85 posted on 02/28/2006 9:53:05 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson