Posted on 03/01/2006 12:55:39 PM PST by jcb8199
RAPID CITY — The South Dakota Legislature’s passage of an abortion ban bill prompted an angry reaction from abortion-rights supporters who vowed to boycott the state’s tourism industry.
The state Department of Tourism received a dozen e-mails and a number of angry phone calls Friday from abortion-rights supporters who say they will not vacation in South Dakota.
A Madison, Wis.,-based group has formally called for a boycott of South Dakota tourism. In a news release titled “Bypass South Dakota!”, the Women’s Medical Fund urged supporters to steer clear of South Dakota.
“All kinds of families visit Mount Rushmore every year. It’s a favorite of Americans and foreign tourists. But we can do without Mount Rushmore, the Black Hills, the Badlands and the Corn Palace,” Anne Gaylor, director of the Fund, wrote. “We are encouraging all groups who care about women’s rights to urge their members to bypass South Dakota.”
Billie Jo Waara, head of the state office of tourism, said her office has been hearing from people throughout the country.
“They have commented on the fact that the state is a great destination for travel, but our current political situation doesn’t match their agenda,” Waara said.
Waara said she was unsure exactly how many phone calls the Tourism Department has received. She confirmed that the agency got 12 e-mails, a small number compared with the Tourism Office’s daily e-mail traffic.
She hasn’t heard of anyone canceling trips that were already planned for South Dakota; the callers and e-mailers are instead saying they won’t make plans to visit the state.
“Certainly, this is an important issue for South Dakota, an important issue for our country. Our state’s leadership (Legislature) is taking their position, and we’ll have to determine what impact this will have on our industry,” she said.
Meanwhile, the Rapid City Journal received seven letters to the editor on Thursday and Friday that specifically call for a tourism boycott of South Dakota.
One of the letter writers, Louise Jezierski of Okemos, Mich., wrote that she and her husband have visited the Badlands and Black Hills in the past. “We planned to take our two boys to share with them this very special place,” she wrote Friday. “But today, the government of the state of South Dakota voted to take away the civil rights of women and their families. I cannot, in good conscience, support any economy that thrives on intolerance and promotes the relegation of women to second class citizenship.”
In an interview Friday afternoon, Gaylor of the Women’s Medical Fund compared a South Dakota tourism boycott to the 1990 Idaho potato boycott, which she said was successful in turning back an abortion ban in the state.
The potato boycott never became an actual boycott. The National Organization for Women and other pro-choice groups called for a boycott of Idaho’s most famous agricultural product.
Pro-life groups countered with a drive to encourage members to increase potato consumption if the bill became law.
It isn’t clear what effect the potato boycott threat actually had. Then-Gov. Cecil Andrus vetoed the abortion bill, citing an aversion to out-of-state pressure.
Tourism is billed as South Dakota’s second-largest industry, behind agriculture. It isn’t clear whether the “Bypass South Dakota” movement has broad support. The National Organization for Women Web site posted a statement decrying the South Dakota Legislature’s vote. However, it made no specific mention Friday of a boycott.
South Dakota has seen various tourism boycotts in the past. Most recently, some motorcycle groups vowed to boycott the Sturgis motorcycle rally to protest what they believed was a light sentence for Rep. Bill Janklow’s manslaughter conviction. He served 100 days in jail for killing a motorcyclist in an auto accident.
In 2003, American Indian groups called for a South Dakota tourism boycott to protest the treatment of Indian burial grounds and sacred sites.
Neither had a significant effect on visitation.
Bill Honerkamp, head of the Black Hills, Badlands & Lakes Association, said Friday he was not aware of an abortion-rights tourism boycott of South Dakota.
“That’s the first I’ve heard of it,” he said. “We’re powerless to stop a faction from staging a boycott, but I can’t imagine it having much political leverage (on the Legislature).”
Contact Dan Daly at 394-8421 or dan.daly@rapidcityjournal.com
Of course beauty is in the eye of the beholder...as a female, I am left neutral at the photo of the lady you posted.
Seriously though I remember really enjoying our time in South Dakota...I always think of "North by Northwest" when I remember Mt. Rushmore. Too bad we couldn't get over to Wyoming..may we'll head west next time.
"In a news release titled 'Bypass South Dakota!', the Women’s Medical Fund urged supporters to steer clear of South Dakota...SNIP...But we can do without Mount Rushmore, the Black Hills, the Badlands and the Corn Palace,' Anne Gaylor, director of the Fund, wrote."
Anne Gaylor and Annie Laurie Gaylor (Mother & Daughter fascists) founded the "Freedom FROM Religion Foundation," just so you all know who is REALLY behind this (useless, IMHO) boycott.
http://ffrf.org/
LOL--Brangelina, we're not going to the Black Hills this summer! We'll have to go, instead, to the South of France!
I thought Gaylor was head of the Freedom From Religion Association. I guess she is branching out.
I agree! :)
Yeah, I'm sure bike week in Sturgis will be deeply affected......NOT!!!!
It is an excellent idea for those who favor killing pre-born children to not vacation in South Dakota. The pro-choice crowd tends to be quite unsavory in behavior and appearance. The P. C. {pro-choice} people would blend in much better amongst their peers in San Francisco, Ithaca, and West Hollywood.
Guess this means you're unaware of the Mount Rushmore National Memorial, Black Hills National Forest (perhaps "Sturgis" rings a bell), and Badlands National Park. Each is a worthy vacation destination in itself, and they're all located in western South Dakota.
Yes, South Dakota has quite a tourism industry.
Oh,Big Deal!!Threatening to boycott S.D.with their families.WHAT FAMILIES?THEY'VE BEEN KILLING EM ALL!
Tom Daschle is deeply saddened ...
I've seen so many rocks and trees in my life, grew up in a town named for rocks, seen rocks and trees and fields foreign and domestic, no way I'd go to SoDak for anything other than the Frozen Four, which doesn't look to be heading to Vermillion any time soon, considering they have neither a rink nor a team of their own.
The NAACP boycott of South Carolina has been great the last five years. Hope SD's boycott goes just as well. :-)
Mm-kay. Your loss.
no way I'd go to SoDak for anything other than the Frozen Four, which doesn't look to be heading to Vermillion any time soon, considering they have neither a rink nor a team of their own.
Whatever. ;O)
Plus they allow hunting, too.
Time to plan a trip to South Dakota!
I think I'll take the family down there and start filling out job applications...
Well, you should write to the PTB in SD and let them know!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.