Skip to comments.
Breaking - Supreme Court Upholds "Colleges who accept Federal Funds must allow Military Recruiters"
FoxNews ^
| 03/06/2006
| Leofl
Posted on 03/06/2006 7:12:47 AM PST by Leofl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 321-340 next last
To: VeniVidiVici
No, they'll think it's time to get more activist judges on the bench so horrible decisions like this won't keep happening.
101
posted on
03/06/2006 7:45:32 AM PST
by
Brytani
(Democrats - destroying America since 1868)
To: moose2004
Has anyone seen my patchoulli oil?
To: One4Indictment
103
posted on
03/06/2006 7:47:06 AM PST
by
moose2004
(You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
To: Leofl
The Roberts CourtThe President has his legacy.
104
posted on
03/06/2006 7:47:20 AM PST
by
SmithL
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: Leofl
105
posted on
03/06/2006 7:47:46 AM PST
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: Leofl
You REALLY gotta warn folks how gross that link is!
106
posted on
03/06/2006 7:48:24 AM PST
by
ibheath
(Born again and grateful to God.)
To: ExpatCanuck
Watch for more 8-0 decisions on major issues in the upcoming future. Who do you think will not vote on major issues?
107
posted on
03/06/2006 7:48:30 AM PST
by
HoustonCurmudgeon
(Justice and "The Law" are not always the same thing.)
To: Republican Red
Is that picture real or did someone doctor that? I am ROTFL at it.
To: staytrue
You may find states who accept highway money being forced to build mass transit or else
Isn't that one of the reasons conservatives support limited government?
Maybe this will illustrate to the Left why the Right opposes statism.
I know I'm naive, but maybe it will jolt them into supporting smaller federal government when they finally see that the sword can cut both ways now that its starting to cut them.
To: Republican Red
BWAAAAHAAAAHAAAA! Where did you get that drawing?????
110
posted on
03/06/2006 7:49:36 AM PST
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: Republican Red
111
posted on
03/06/2006 7:49:54 AM PST
by
pookie18
([Hillary Rotten] Clinton Happens...as does Dr. Demento Dean, Bela Pelosi & Benedick Durbin!!)
To: OldFriend
Donner Party? That's funny.
112
posted on
03/06/2006 7:50:14 AM PST
by
pissant
Comment #113 Removed by Moderator
To: CIB-173RDABN
I agree, however, colleges across the country reap the benefit of having a military to defend their rights, and as a result, the government should have access to at least ask them if they wish to join the Armed Forces. I don't think that is too much of a price to pay for the federal funds. Otherwise, they can simply refuse the federal funds.
114
posted on
03/06/2006 7:52:58 AM PST
by
rlmorel
("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
To: Old Sarge
"A military recruiter's mere presence on campus does not violate a law school's right to associate, regardless of how repugnant the law school considers the recruiter's message," he wrote. Maybe this explains why so many lawyers are repugnant!
115
posted on
03/06/2006 7:53:00 AM PST
by
jan in Colorado
(Beware of the ENEMEDIA!!! What treason have they perpetrated today?)
To: pissant
116
posted on
03/06/2006 7:53:03 AM PST
by
Jay777
(My personal blog: www.stoptheaclu.com)
To: K4Harty
That picture is real. At least it is an originally drawn picture done by a court artist. It was only shown on Fox News. I have saved it for posterity. Does anything else scream "retirement" louder?
117
posted on
03/06/2006 7:53:06 AM PST
by
Republican Red
("How good is it? Al-Jazeera gave it 4 1/2 pipe bombs")
To: Leofl
Now let's see what the colleges do. Ban the recruiters or keep the money.
118
posted on
03/06/2006 7:53:11 AM PST
by
coffeebreak
(Judicial liberalism is destroying this country.)
To: Leofl
Life is good. :-)
Thank you President Bush.
To: Leofl
Supreme Court Upholds "Colleges who accept Federal Funds must allow Military Recruiters I wonder how San Francisco will circumvent this problem? SFSU would not be allowed recruiters per city law.
120
posted on
03/06/2006 7:55:31 AM PST
by
Mike Darancette
(In the Land of the Blind the one-eyed man is king.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 321-340 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
