Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: XJarhead
Sorry if I offended.

Notice I didn't say ALL lawyers. My point was that if the Law Schools consider the military "repugnant,"...well, never mind. As I said, I certainly didn't mean ALL lawyers!

151 posted on 03/06/2006 8:09:29 AM PST by jan in Colorado (Beware of the ENEMEDIA!!! What treason have they perpetrated today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: jan in Colorado
I understand. It's just that lawyers get slammed so much, but we're the ones out there most often fighting in public for the conservative agenda in the courts and legal system. The biggest single source of intellectual firepower in the conservative movement is the Federalist Society, loathed and demonized by libs everywhere. And its overwhelming composed of lawyers who've been at the forefront of the fight since the early 80's.

My point was that if the Law Schools consider the military "repugnant,"

It was the law professors who filed because they could appear pro se. But it was university professors as a whole that voted for that ban, and they cover a lot more than just law.

One odd little detail is that the Harvard Law faculty tends to be very liberal. So does the law school as a whole. But its was among law students at Harvard, Yale, and Chicago that the Federalist Society got started in 1982. Guess being force-fed all that liberalism finally got to be too much for them.

184 posted on 03/06/2006 8:42:59 AM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson