Replies

You're absolutely right!

We also know the left is totally godless. Now, I wonder, who are they following ... .

Let me help you out from the mouth of an egotistical, er idiot:

The Problem with God: Interview with Richard Dawkins

Here are a few choice excerpts:

Question:
What are your thoughts about the despair some people feel when they ponder natural selection and random mutation? The idea of evolution and natural selection makes some people feel that everything is meaningless--people’s individual lives and life in general.

Answer from the evolutionist high priest, Dawkins:

If it’s true that it causes people to feel despair, that’s tough. It’s still the truth. The universe doesn’t owe us condolence or consolation; it doesn’t owe us a nice warm feeling inside. If it’s true, it’s true, and you'd better live with it.

Question:
You criticize intelligent design, saying that "the theistic answer"--pointing to God as designer--"is deeply unsatisfying"--presumably you mean on a logical, scientific level.

Answer by the renowned Dawkins:

Yes, because it doesn’t explain where the designer comes from. If they’re going to emphasize the statistical improbability of biological organs—"these are so complicated, how could they have evolved?"--well, if they’re so complicated, how could they possibly have been designed? Because the designer would have to be even more complicated.

My comment - Imagine that! Just to think for a second that there could be SOMEONE more intelligent that Dawkins and more complicated than Dawkins is just, well UNTHINKABLE! He truly wants to believe HE, Dawkins knows it ALL better! LOL!! The arrogance and HUGE ego here is surreal. Boy is he in for a suprise when he meets his Maker! Then it'll be too late.

Question:
Is atheism the logical extension of believing in evolution?

Answer by the cold hearted and arrogant ATHEIST, Dawkins:

They clearly can’t be irrevocably linked because a very large number of theologians believe in evolution. In fact, any respectable theologian of the Catholic or Anglican or any other sensible church believes in evolution. Similarly, a very large number of evolutionary scientists are also religious. My personal feeling is that understanding evolution led me to atheism.

My comment: It's common sense. When you remove God and what the Bible teaches you slowly if no immediately stop believing in God. The order of evolution all wrong. There is NO evidence to support it and of course when you keep telling a lie often enough there will always be dumbed down idiots willing to believe it. It is NO coincidence that evolution leads one to ATHEISM. Dawkins is NO exception to that fact.

Elsewhere he suggests that God is some imaginary friend and that adoptions are the result of "genetic mistakes". Guess Moses failed to realize he was a "genetic mistake".

The entire philosophy of evolution is atheism. Evolution is the religion of atheism. The left wants to encourage atheism and through what better vehicle in academia than through, godless, mindless, nonsensical evolution that has absolutely NO EVIDENCE to support it. It's a deck of cards built on lies supplied by leading atheists.

http://www.beliefnet.com/story/178/story_17889.html

The entire philosophy of evolution is atheism.

This would appear to be false in light of the large number of people who accept evolution who are also theists. I find it strange that you continue to ignore this fact in spite of ample evidence for it. In fact, I find it nearly as strange as your claim that you had never mentioned Antony Flew despite a previous posting, to which I had directly linked, wherein you made a very clear statement about the man.

I don't care whether Dawkins worships his own left foot.

It doesn't affect the ToE in the slightest.

In fact, the only thing your post convinces me of is you have a shaky grasp of logic.

The entire philosophy of evolution is atheism. Evolution is the religion of atheism. The left wants to encourage atheism and through what better vehicle in academia than through, godless, mindless, nonsensical evolution that has absolutely NO EVIDENCE to support it. It's a deck of cards built on lies supplied by leading atheists.

nmh, you remind me of this crow that appears near my bedroom window every other morning or so. He just squawks and squawks, repeating the same annoying squawk over and over again, louder and louder.

And yet, he never says anything new and always without substance. Your act has grown boring. Your first sentence above makes absolutely no sense - you mix philospophy with science with the lack of a belief in a deity. 3 distinct things to my mind.

What parts of academia are "god-full?"