Skip to comments.
Former Top Judge Says US Risks Edging Near To Dictatorship
The Guardian (UK) ^
| 3-13-2006
| Julian Borger
Posted on 03/12/2006 6:49:12 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-123 next last
To: OKIEDOC
If you're interested, here's a fantastic series of videos of a debate between Scalia and Breyer involving the use of foreign law in Constitutional considerations.
To: CheyennePress
To: blam
Why did Bush nominate her to the Supreme Court? It just proves that he is a RINO unlike Reagan.
Oh wait . . .
To: blam
"We must be ever-vigilant against those who would strong-arm the judiciary." By now, I'm sure someone else has said it. We must be ever vigilant against a judiciary that would strong-arm the Constitution and the people.
64
posted on
03/12/2006 7:23:03 PM PST
by
n-tres-ted
(Remember November!)
To: BnBlFlag
"But a dictatorship of the Judiciary is just fine"
Reagan didn't make many mistakes, but O'Connor certainly was one of them and Kennedy was another.
In the past, Republicans have made some horrible nominations to the Supreme Court - Warren, Brennan, Blackmum, Stevens, Souter and Reagan's two losers. The good picks (Rhindquist, Burger, Scalia, Thomas and hopefully the two rookies). They're not any better than Democrat appointees, in fact Breyer may actually be better than Stevens.
65
posted on
03/12/2006 7:23:13 PM PST
by
BW2221
To: blam
Perhaps the vaunted "Judiciary" should bother to read the clear text of the Constitution.
Exactly how did "Public" became "Private" in Kelo?
66
posted on
03/12/2006 7:23:17 PM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(The Prophet Muhammed, Piss Be Upon Him)
To: Parmenio
I've hated Nina (and hate is not too strong a word) since the entire Thomas debacle.
But you're right, the tone struck me as very much consistent with "agenda."
I'm no major fan of O'Conner, but the way this is reported really seems different than the way she ruled. So I'll go with actions rather than agenda driven words.
To: blam
There are still too many pussies in the US.
The fascists will rise from the ruins, after several US cities are nuked while our government handholds the pacifist children in our ranks.
The current breed of pussified leftists can only imagine a real fascist.
They have never met one, and in fact will only meet one, once, on their last day.
68
posted on
03/12/2006 7:23:56 PM PST
by
mmercier
(so it goes)
To: BnBlFlag
####But a dictatorship of the Judiciary is just fine.####
Yep! If the Supreme Court voted 5-4 tomorrow to forcibly impose gay "marriage" on the nation, overturning the democratically enacted bans on such "marriages" in numerous states, O'Connor would accuse critics of the court ruling of wanting to set up a dictatorship.
This woman is an embarrassment. Ronald Reagan was a great man and a great president, but no one's perfect, and he made a tragic error putting O'Connor on the court. She ruled right on occassion (Kelo, for instance), but overall she showed no regard for the Constitution, the will of the people, or our nation's history and traditions, not to mention our national sovereignty.
69
posted on
03/12/2006 7:24:26 PM PST
by
puroresu
(Conservatism is an observation; Liberalism is an ideology)
To: blam
Sandra O'Day should concern herself with the subverting ACLU dictatorship!
70
posted on
03/12/2006 7:24:45 PM PST
by
purpleland
(Elegy 9/11/01 Vigilance and Valor! Socialism is the Opiate of Academia)
To: blam
The only danger is judicial dictatorship - when judges come to believe that they are philosopher-kings.
To: All
By Cboldt
On Sandra Day O'Connor: ...snip...
she is a practitioner of outcome-based jurisprudence
There is your political obit Sandra. Better put some ice on that one. Quite the tasty little bon mot that is.
72
posted on
03/12/2006 7:28:04 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Are you not entertained? Are you NOT entertained? Is this not what you came here for?)
To: edcoil
Hey, I am an old people! lol
73
posted on
03/12/2006 7:28:19 PM PST
by
jerry639
To: blam
Pardon me if I don't believe anything this nutcase writes...
The spies who pushed for war
Julian Borger reports on the shadow rightwing intelligence network set up in Washington to second-guess the CIA and deliver a justification for toppling Saddam Hussein by force
Thursday July 17, 2003
The Guardian
White House 'lied about Saddam threat'
July 10, 2003
by Julian Borger
Bush makes poor pay for military might and tax cuts: Schools and health lose out as US public services endure worst crisis since 1930s
May 26, 2003
by Julian Borger (Guardian Unlimited)
http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/Pictures/Persons/093036/093036-188725-09.jpg
74
posted on
03/12/2006 7:28:31 PM PST
by
kcvl
To: Brad Cloven
Judge O'Conner, Please explain what part of the 10th Amendment could you not understand where ruling on the Texas Sodomy case?
75
posted on
03/12/2006 7:29:54 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Are you not entertained? Are you NOT entertained? Is this not what you came here for?)
To: blam
Sandra Day O'Connor, a Republican-appointed judge who retired last month after 24 years on the supreme court, has said the US is in danger of edging towards dictatorship if the party's rightwingers continue to attack the judiciary.Yes, we're heading for tyranny, but it won't be the party or individual many will think or say it is going to be. It will be someone no one expected. The politics are so polarized in this country right now we are heading fast in that direction. The end result is going to shock a lot of people.
76
posted on
03/12/2006 7:30:11 PM PST
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: trubluolyguy
Notice how they through the whole appointed by a Republican bit in there. So was Stevens, as if that means anything.
77
posted on
03/12/2006 7:31:55 PM PST
by
okiecon
To: blam
Shuddup and sing, Sandy, the Dipsy Chickens are looking for a new lead singer, by the way!
78
posted on
03/12/2006 7:32:38 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: blam
I'm surprised anybody stayed awake through one of her lectures. She is the most boring speaker I've ever had inflicted upon me.
79
posted on
03/12/2006 7:33:05 PM PST
by
USNBandit
(sarcasm engaged at all times)
To: blam
Sandra Day O'Connor, a Republican-appointed judge Who became a leftist, anti American swing vote soon after her appointment. Oh, excuse me, I should have said a "moderate" swing vote. No surprize here.
80
posted on
03/12/2006 7:33:07 PM PST
by
zip
((Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough become truth to 48% of all Americans (NRA))))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson