1 posted on
03/12/2006 6:51:03 PM PST by
Boot Hill
To: Boot Hill
promoting a violent version of Islam can itself be an act of terrorism.
And the violent version is different from any other because.....?
2 posted on
03/12/2006 6:55:37 PM PST by
trubluolyguy
(I don't hate Arabs. But I wouldn't trust a muzzie as far as I could throw Ted Kennedy.)
To: Boot Hill
I guess if you beat a mule hard enough with a 4x4, you get it's attention after all.
3 posted on
03/12/2006 7:02:05 PM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie, because he didn't bake one.)
To: Boot Hill
"Anyone who preaches hate and violence lays the basis for committing crimes directed at instilling fear among the people and destroying Dutch democracy," Why can't the Europeans distinguish between thought and speech on the one hand, and incitement to violence and violence on the other? They keep conflating the two.
Certainly the cretinous Islamonazis should be locked up for inciting violence. But one should be allowed to preach hate. I hate murderous, barbarous, Islamonazis (a distinct Muslim sub-group), and should be allowed to preach it. Would I be locked up in the Netherlands if I preached that rational distaste?
7 posted on
03/12/2006 7:13:59 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(The Prophet Muhammed, Piss Be Upon Him)
To: Boot Hill
Hard to believe. A hint of rationality found in Western Europe. It'll be overturned, not to fear.
8 posted on
03/12/2006 7:35:25 PM PST by
Rembrandt
(We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
To: Boot Hill
Nice.
We need Rico style laws inacted specifically for going after the religion of peace.
The patriot act was a good start.
10 posted on
03/12/2006 7:43:20 PM PST by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: Boot Hill
"Though most sentences were short, the judgment was sweeping."
No doubt the convicts will repent while serving their short sentences. Ha.
The only short sentence that would change these guy's minds would be something like:
"You shall be taken from this courtroom and used to plug a hole in a dike."
To: Boot Hill
"The convicted men, known as the Hofstad Group, included Mohammed Bouyeri, who already is serving a life sentence for the 2004 murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh."
"Bouyeri was found guilty of being a ringleader of the group, but judges could add nothing to his sentence."
Well, then they should subtract from his sentence. They should shorten it considerably. While still keeping it a life sentence.
To: Boot Hill
Westerners have misunderstood the Dutch for a long time. They embraced tolerance because it worked for them, or at least seemed to. Now they will make potential immigrants watch video of two men kissing in public {ugh}and women sunbathing topless {yum!} and those that don't react appropriately will not be allowed in. This will also work for them. They are a very practical people.
It's also a mistake to equate tolerance with liberalism - one we especially should not make. The Dutch have been tolerant for practical reasons, but are probably less liberal than most Europeans.
To: Boot Hill; neverdem; Tolik
ping
this, on top of the possible (if unlikely) lawsuit attempting the illegalization of the Koran in Germany, sure is interesting
22 posted on
03/12/2006 10:35:15 PM PST by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
To: Boot Hill
With Muslims, half measures don't work. It'll get worse until the Dutch boot them out wholesale. All of the EU needs to do this. Of course, Algeria or Morocco or wherever won't take them all back, but Syria has a few spare beds.
25 posted on
03/13/2006 3:11:15 AM PST by
hershey
To: Boot Hill
Scavenger Hunt of the Day:
Try to find a non-violent version of Islam.
26 posted on
03/13/2006 6:52:52 AM PST by
thoughtomator
(Nobody would have cared if the UAE wanted to buy Macy's...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson