To: proud_yank; Carry_Okie; SauronOfMordor
otherwise flawless coastal views You missed the most important part. Got to have a flawless view for all those high priced mansions who occupants donated so heavily to the environmental cause.
11 posted on
03/13/2006 7:02:24 PM PST by
FOG724
(Arnold is not a Republican)
To: FOG724
You missed the most important part. Got to have a flawless view for all those high priced mansions who occupants donated so heavily to the environmental cause. As artificial islands they could be attractive.
12 posted on
03/13/2006 7:05:18 PM PST by
Carry_Okie
(There are people in power who are truly evil.)
To: FOG724; SauronOfMordor; Carry_Okie
Got to have a flawless view for all those high priced mansions whoLiberal occupants donated so heavily to the environmental cause.
Bingo! Much like Teddy & Effin fighting wind farms in Mass.
13 posted on
03/13/2006 7:08:31 PM PST by
proud_yank
(Liberalism - The 'Culture of Ignorance'.)
To: FOG724
"You missed the most important part."
The continuation of the article says that the platforms would be cut so low that ships could pass over them safely. Therefore, no ruined view, no bird refuges, no islands usable for other purposes. Just open ocean, and an artificial underwater reef.
19 posted on
03/13/2006 7:18:02 PM PST by
gleeaikin
(Question Authority)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson