To: NCjim
Hmm, seems we're getting a bit loose with the term "terrorist."
2 posted on
03/14/2006 4:53:52 PM PST by
Lunatic Fringe
(Olfrygt: the nagging fear of being unable to find beer while out of town.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
I don't see why the term "fanatic" isn't used.
4 posted on
03/14/2006 4:56:45 PM PST by
1rudeboy
To: Lunatic Fringe
--Hmm, seems we're getting a bit loose with the term "terrorist."
The guy who shot all the white people in the subway using a machine gun would be a terrorist then. If we keep it up we'll have to come up with a new word or phrase for the real terrorists. Lunatic's better for this one unless some connection with something larger than this one guy can be shown.
9 posted on
03/14/2006 5:02:26 PM PST by
bkepley
To: Lunatic Fringe
Murder of civilians for political means pretty much sums it up. We've simply been to tolerant of it in the past.
10 posted on
03/14/2006 5:04:57 PM PST by
Dead Dog
To: Lunatic Fringe
Hmm, seems we're getting a bit loose with the term "terrorist."
How about Islamic.
11 posted on
03/14/2006 5:08:37 PM PST by
Man50D
To: Lunatic Fringe
Hmm, seems we're getting a bit loose with the term "terrorist." What if another Muslim does the same thing next week and succeeds in killing a few people?
To: Lunatic Fringe
I think the term "stupid a-hole" works just fine.
18 posted on
03/14/2006 6:12:15 PM PST by
RockinRight
(Attention RNC...we're the party of Reagan, not FDR)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Muzzie attacking innocent Americans in the name of Allah - the definition of a terrorist attack.
22 posted on
03/14/2006 6:44:44 PM PST by
Galveston Grl
(Getting angry and abandoning power to the Democrats is not a choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson