To: WayneLusvardi
To: WayneLusvardi
How bout we make disease research proportional to the number killed by a given disease. The screaming aids activists wouldn't be too happy to see their funding cut to a fraction of what it gets now.
6 posted on
03/21/2006 7:59:17 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
To: WayneLusvardi
Whenever the "newsies" say "SCARIER" or "SCARY" that means "Propaganda Follows".
7 posted on
03/21/2006 7:59:34 AM PST by
muawiyah
(-)
To: WayneLusvardi
So now it's government's job to cure cancer?
Talk about "womb to the tom".
8 posted on
03/21/2006 8:01:27 AM PST by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: WayneLusvardi
I am sorry Mrs. Smith, you have a Bushanoma and you will die before the end of the day.
9 posted on
03/21/2006 8:01:38 AM PST by
msnimje
(SAMMY for SANDY --- THAT IS WHAT I CALL A GOOD TRADE!!!)
To: WayneLusvardi
Bush Causes Cancer!!!!!
Well, at least now we know some of what Karl Rove does when it's not hurricane season.
To: WayneLusvardi
I wish this were true. Government destroys medicine.
To: WayneLusvardi
He proposed a cut in the program of $1.4 million Real cut or a slight trim off a $100 million planned increase.
13 posted on
03/21/2006 8:09:00 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(The tree of liberty is getting awfully parched.)
To: WayneLusvardi
Seeking FREEPer ReactionFYI, that's why everything posted here is posted here. ;O)
14 posted on
03/21/2006 8:09:08 AM PST by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
To: WayneLusvardi
The fundamental premise of this article is entirely wrong. If the Founding Fathers saw the detail to which government intrusion has descended, they would be utterly horrified - Jefferson argued that the Federal Government should not fund internal improvements, i.e., roads. He would say that liberty was more important than catering to every little need that one can think of. People have a responsibility to monitor and take care of their own health, it is not the job of the government to do so.
So, as a Freeper, my reaction is this - the author of the article doesn't understand the fundamental premise upon which the government is supposed to be based. But then again, neither do many Republicans.
Regards, Ivan
16 posted on
03/21/2006 8:12:47 AM PST by
MadIvan
(You underestimate the power of the Dark Side - http://www.sithorder.com/)
To: WayneLusvardi
The federal government has a national breast and cervical cancer early detection program,.... I will have to admit this is one area where Slick Willie was much more personally involved than Bush. Slick and his Willie did much personal research in the area of breasts and cervix early detection.
18 posted on
03/21/2006 8:32:41 AM PST by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
To: WayneLusvardi
I'm much less afraid of cancer when government spending goes up...
19 posted on
03/21/2006 8:35:29 AM PST by
Born Conservative
(Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
To: WayneLusvardi
No taxpayer money should go to cancer research until and unless that money stops being used for pacs and publicity. Taxpayer funds should be spent on real science, not propaganda.
20 posted on
03/21/2006 8:57:25 AM PST by
mugs99
(Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson