[Central Scrutiniser]

Evolution does hold up to scientific scrutiny, its a theory that is tested every time there is new data, that is how the scientific method works. ID is not testable, it is not science, it is a dogmatic belief that has no place in a science class. You wanna teach it? Teach it in your church.

[AnnoyedOne]

If a man told you that he walked out his front door, and heard a bird, chirpping at random, a concert perfect rendition of Beethovens Fifth, which would you judge more likely? That it DID happen? Or that he was most likely a nut? I think most would view the guy as a nut, even if it IS statistically possible (though remote). Meanwhile, you expect me to believe that a DNA molecule (let alone all the further development and biodiversity) which is far more complex than any musical score... happened by pure random chance and accident. IMO, you're the nut who thought he heard the bird chirp the song by random chance.

But as for myself... I prefer not to make any judgement about which is the truth until proven, nor to discard any idea until disproven. After all... maybe the bird DID chirp the tune and you really heard it.