To: plain talk
My problem with him is that he's too unrealistic. He acts like the country is going to hell on a shutter because things aren't perfect. He would be finding things wrong with any president - it's like he thinks have to be perfect or ideal, ALL THE TIME. The republicans have screwed up a lot of things, but nobody bats 1000.
To: The Worthless Miracle
Yeah, he's an emotional blowhard. Archie Bunker on steriods. They ought to sell tickets for mano-a mano match of O'Reilly vs Weiner.
To: The Worthless Miracle
My problem with him is that he's too unrealistic. He acts like the country is going to hell on a shutter because things aren't perfect. He would be finding things wrong with any president - it's like he thinks have to be perfect or ideal, ALL THE TIME. The republicans have screwed up a lot of things, but nobody bats 1000.
Let's examine, alright?
My problem with him is that he's too unrealistic.
Oh really? What is unreal about Mike? And don't give me the standard liberal 'He uses a pseudonym' crap usually seen on the 'net. Are his facts and knowledge and info and insight unrealistic, and why? As the only talk show host possessing a PHD, I have to lend creedence to Mike. Not that that makes or breaks a talk-show host; but it certainly argues against his alleged 'stupidity' seen posted on hater's sites.
He acts like the country is going to hell on a shutter because things aren't perfect.
Things aren't exactly on-track.
He would be finding things wrong with any president - it's like he thinks have to be perfect or ideal, ALL THE TIME.
What is wrong with constructive critisism? You don't listen to the show on a regular basis, obviously. No one is immune from his wrath, nor should anyone be.
The republicans have screwed up a lot of things, but nobody bats 1000.
There, we have no argument, my friend.
24 posted on
03/27/2006 9:09:32 PM PST by
Number57
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson