Skip to comments.
CIRCUMCISION: Did you know?
The Daily Barometer ^
| Today
| Daniel Cullen
Posted on 04/05/2006 5:19:29 PM PDT by Giant Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520, 521-540, 541-560 ... 581 next last
To: Cincinna
Abraham never existed. And some lunatic who heard voices telling him to kill or cut his own son merits zero credibility in any case, even as a story character.
To: Giant Conservative
the majority of American men are walking around without foreskins for no good reasonBottom line on the article, it actually does a "tiny bit" of good, medically and absolutely no harm, but otherwise there's "no good reason" to do it. Oh, did you forget to address that whole "God told us to as a part of our compact with Him" question? That's not important, you say? Okey dokey. I guess we know where you stand on that issue.
522
posted on
10/16/2006 6:32:18 PM PDT
by
Phsstpok
(Often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: Giant Conservative
In fact, it is barbarism
I don't remember a thing but the real important issue is who can I sue?
FWIW, I think someone spanked me too.......... Can I sue?
523
posted on
10/16/2006 6:36:19 PM PDT
by
Hot Tabasco
(Cure for liberal stupidity: Louisville Slugger, apply directly to the forehead!)
To: Phsstpok
To: WLR
found no mention of circumcision in the Korean
Kim Jong Il has been pretty secretive about this.........I don't think you'll get much info from him.
525
posted on
10/16/2006 6:42:19 PM PDT
by
Hot Tabasco
(Cure for liberal stupidity: Louisville Slugger, apply directly to the forehead!)
To: Phsstpok
The article specifcally excluded circumcision for religion. Those who are jewish are free to practice their faith. (christianity dealt with this during the early days when the apsotles adressed conversion without the need for circumcision) I believe moslems advocate circumcision for religion too.
526
posted on
10/16/2006 6:45:14 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Giant Conservative
I repeat. Okey dokey.
Real simple question for you, since this appears to be your position on the issue.
What if you're wrong?
If those who believe are wrong, what is the problem? If you're wrong.... hoo doggies!
Or do you have a ... personal problem... in this area?
527
posted on
10/16/2006 6:47:09 PM PDT
by
Phsstpok
(Often wrong, but never in doubt)
To: DainBramage
I was so traumatized by circumcision I kept pulling on it every chance I got for 2 decades.Sheeesh! I couldn't walk for almost a year!
528
posted on
10/16/2006 6:49:19 PM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: All
WHat the ___!! Over 500 posts about MALE anatomy and NOT ONE PICTURE? I see a Picture of a topless WOMAN....but NO MALES??? Talk about double standards!
529
posted on
10/16/2006 6:51:04 PM PDT
by
Fawn
(http://www.jokaroo.com/funnyvideos/toilet_obsession.html)
To: longtermmemmory
see the original posters post #
521 Nuff said
530
posted on
10/16/2006 6:52:06 PM PDT
by
Phsstpok
(Often wrong, but never in doubt)
Comment #531 Removed by Moderator
To: Cecily
Why don't the Muslims circumcise babies according to the biblical directions (on the eighth day after birth)? Is it because Ishmael was circumcised when he was 13? If you want to get down to it, some were close to 40 after roaming the desert for 40 years.
532
posted on
10/16/2006 6:55:34 PM PDT
by
LowOiL
("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
To: Giant Conservative
In short, the idea that neonatal circumcision is the answer to all of mens ills is erroneousWhen I see this type of crap intrude into what may have been an attempt at a lucid argument, where someone claims "all" of anything, then the 'Moonbat issue polarization detector' goes off and I begin to have phantom pain in my foreskin.
As far as the foreskin goes, I don't miss it, don't remember it, and I'm not going to have it put back on after all these years.
533
posted on
10/16/2006 6:55:53 PM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: Cincinna
Like the Jewish religious practice of circumcision, American nonreligious circumcision is dependent on the acceptance of cultural beliefs,..
and
Religious circumcision is one thing, ...
The impression I had from the article that the author is saying that the only reason for circumcision was faith and that those of faith are free to do so if they so pleased.
The only thing the author is really saying is that there is no real science to back up secular circumcision.
534
posted on
10/16/2006 6:56:38 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Michael Goldsberry
If women were getting circumcised for no good reason
Unfortunately, young girls (usually Islamic) around the world have been forced to undergo female circumcision. This is when the clitoris and inner labia are cut (with no anestesia) and in some case the labia majora is cut off and they are sewn almost shut with just a small opening.
To: Phsstpok
true.
well that is a definit troll alert.
536
posted on
10/16/2006 6:58:48 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Melas
You have no idea how tired I get of the "The rest of the world" does it this way crap.
Next time some simpleton lays that one on you just reply that a billion flies eat sh*t. Bon Appetit!
537
posted on
10/16/2006 7:01:07 PM PDT
by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the occupation media.)
To: Giant Conservative
Abraham never existed. And some lunatic who heard voices telling him to kill or cut his own son merits zero credibility in any case, even as a story character. Did a voice tell you this?
538
posted on
10/16/2006 7:16:24 PM PDT
by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
To: TDunn
The current move away from elective, non-therapeutic circumcision of boys finds its roots in common sense. It is not a liberal issue or a conservative issue. It is a common sense issue. I don't think of it as wee-wee cutting which it's not. I like to think of it as body sculpting.
539
posted on
10/16/2006 7:18:41 PM PDT
by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
To: TDunn; WLR
You whole arguement that people in the Western states did away with circumcision "because there is no compelling reason to do it", negates just ONE fact. That the MORMONs made up a few scripts to say to not do it.
In Moroni 8:8, in the Book of Mormon, Christ, following his death and resurrection, is speaking to the peoples of the western hemisphere, known as the Nephites and Lamanites.
"Listen to the words of Christ, your Redeemer, your Lord, and your God. Behold, I came into the world not to call the righteous but sinners to repentance; the whole need no physician, but they that are sick; wherefore, little children are whole, for they are not capable of committing sin; wherefore the curse of Adam is taken from them in me, that it hath no power over them; and the law of circumcision is done away in me."
---------------------------------
Very dishonest of you to not include that simple fact sir. Western states are skewed because of the high number belonging to the cult Mormonism.
540
posted on
10/16/2006 7:23:05 PM PDT
by
LowOiL
("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" - Benjamin Rush)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520, 521-540, 541-560 ... 581 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson