Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Panerai

Good thing they weren't terrorists putting poison into the water. I thought water supplies were supposed to be protected.


6 posted on 04/07/2006 4:05:36 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kittymyrib

No brainer, isn't it?


8 posted on 04/07/2006 4:17:22 AM PDT by Ladysmith ((NRA, SAS))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: kittymyrib

Do the math. 1.3 million gal tank. If they put in 1.5 gals of lets say poison, it would still only be 1 part per million.

By weight we are talking about 10,400,000 lbs. It would require a 10 pound sack of contaminant to equal 1 part per million.

Remember also that water is leaving and entering the tank at the same time further diluting the contaminant. It really is more difficult than one would think to effectively poison a large water supply.

That does not mean, These idiots should be taken lightly.

It does mean, however, that we should keep these "scares" in perspective.


13 posted on 04/07/2006 6:36:29 AM PDT by rock58seg (Republicans on ports,As funny as Democrats pretending to know about Natl Security and quail hunting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson