Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tribune7
Back again with your best and only shot -- a bit of pissant lawyering over terminology?

Does conflating Darwinian and chemical evolution make one or the other invalid? Does it change one's estimate of the age of the earth? Does it change one's evaluation of fossil evidence, DNA evidence, common descent?
99 posted on 04/15/2006 1:07:11 PM PDT by js1138 (~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
Back again with your best and only shot -- a bit of pissant lawyering over terminology?

LOLOLOLOLOL.

Somebody says something incorrect. I correct them. And you chime in with outrage.

Quck quiz: Who is the one who brought up terminology?

102 posted on 04/15/2006 1:08:45 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
Does conflating Darwinian and chemical evolution make one or the other invalid?

Darwinian or otherwise, the claim that an intelligible universe populated by intelligent beings can come about wholly apart from intelligence, design, or some combination of the two can only be described as something other than emprical science.

106 posted on 04/15/2006 1:13:50 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson