Posted on 04/19/2006 12:58:25 PM PDT by Tim Long
and there it is...
Thanks for the info. It sounds like the University is placing her on on administrative leave possible just until the thing blows over. Not much punishment.
Sally Jacobsen
Michael Jackson You's never pick 'em today from the photos. Time has not been kind
Jaqueline Bouvier (later Kennedy) 1930s
Today's Michael Jackson looks more like that white woman than his own picture you posted...
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Slightly Orwellian... "We never knew her!"
Isn't there something about right-hand and left-hand swastici? Ancient Inidan ("dot-not-feather") kinda thing?
She is an "unperson"...for a few weeks...until people go back to sleep.
Hmmm, found this:
"The name sauwastika is sometimes given for the supposedly "evil", left-facing, form of the swastika (Â). A common myth is that the left-facing swastika is generally regarded as evil in Hindu tradition. This is because the much more common form in India is the right-facing swastika. Indians of all faiths sometimes use the symbol in both orientations - mostly for symmetry. Buddhists (outside India) generally use the left-facing swastika over the right-facing swastika although, again, both can be used. Despite this, the misconception that the left-facing swastika is evil is widespread, even among some contemporary Indian communities."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.