Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing to Take on Airbus with (1000 seat) giant 797 Blended Wing Plane
New Tech Spy ^ | 4/24/06 | staff

Posted on 04/25/2006 11:19:38 AM PDT by pissant

Boeing is preparing a 1000 passenger jet that could reshape the air travel industry for the next 100 years.

The radical Blended Wing design has been developed by Boeing in cooperation with the NASA Langley Research Center. The mammoth plane will have a wing span of 265 feet compared to the 747’s 211 feet, and is designed to fit within the newly created terminals used for the 555 seat Airbus A380, which is 262 feet wide. The new 797 is in direct response to the Airbus A380 which has racked up159 orders, but has not yet flown any passengers.

Boeing decide to kill its 747X stretched super jumbo in 2003 after little interest was shown by airline companies, but has continued to develop the ultimate Airbus crusher 797 for years at its Phantom Works research facility in Long Beach, Calif. The Airbus A380 has been in the works since 1999 and has accumulated $13 billion in development costs, which gives Boeing a huge advantage now that Airbus has committed to the older style tubular aircraft for decades to come.

There are several big advantages to the blended wing design, the most important being the lift to drag ratio which is expected to increase by an amazing 50%, with overall weight reduced by 25%, making it an estimated 33% more efficient than the A380, and making Airbus’s $13 billion dollar investment look pretty shaky. High body rigidity is another key factor in blended wing aircraft, it reduces turbulence and creates less stress on the air frame which adds to efficiency, giving the 797 a tremendous 8800 nautical mile range with its 1000 passengers flying comfortably at mach .88 or 654 mph cruising speed (another advantage over the Airbus tube-and-wing designed A380’s 570 mph)

The exact date for introduction is unclear, yet the battle lines are clearly drawn in the high-stakes war for civilian air supremacy.

”This is a great advancement in commercial aviation and a huge win for boeing" April 24, 06


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: 797; a380; airbust; b797; boeing; zoinks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last
Not sure how accurate this publication is, but it would be cool.


1 posted on 04/25/2006 11:19:41 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pissant
Boeing is preparing a 1000 passenger jet that could reshape the air travel industry for the next 100 years

That'll make a terrorist's mouth water.
2 posted on 04/25/2006 11:21:21 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Someday we'll look back on all this and plow into a parked car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

No way - a flying MONSTER-BUS.


3 posted on 04/25/2006 11:22:26 AM PDT by roaddog727 (eludium PU36 explosive space modulator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Is this going to be able to use existing jetbridges or require a major overhaul like the 380 did


4 posted on 04/25/2006 11:23:34 AM PDT by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Boeing has been working on the 747 Advanced, and I cannot see them dropping it at this time.


5 posted on 04/25/2006 11:23:58 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Jesus on Immigration, John 10:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
It would be cool from a stictly aviation-nut perspective. But I have to wonder if there's a need for such a large aircraft, or if it would sell and make some $$$ for Boeing.

Either way, I'd be tickled pink to see one flying overhead!
6 posted on 04/25/2006 11:24:28 AM PDT by LIConFem (A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

Well, they could sink the QMII and make an even bigger splash. (You may groan now).


7 posted on 04/25/2006 11:24:46 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I'll never fly in a jumbo jet again!


8 posted on 04/25/2006 11:25:08 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (Toon Town, Iran...........where reality is the real fantasy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Beam me up, Scottie!
9 posted on 04/25/2006 11:25:37 AM PDT by Churchillspirit (Anaheim Angels - 2002 World Series Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

Yep. But by then, arabs will no longer be able to board planes.


10 posted on 04/25/2006 11:26:58 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Great....that will be 999 idiots with oversized carry-on baggage I'll have to battle with for overhead space. I certainly hope they'll have multiple jetways for boarding and departure.


11 posted on 04/25/2006 11:27:04 AM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

It's spooky. Maybe it could replace the B-52 bomber as well.


12 posted on 04/25/2006 11:27:27 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Boeing has been looking at this concept for decades.

And Northrop proposed this in 1948:

The problem with blended wing aircraft is that the airfoil cross section is so thick that the optimal cruising speed is slower than a conventional design.

13 posted on 04/25/2006 11:27:28 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Looks cool, how about multiple ramps across the rear of the fuselage to make highlift military transport. APC's and tanks roll right off the back and head for from a nearby captured airport.
14 posted on 04/25/2006 11:27:46 AM PDT by conservativewasp (Liberals lie for sport and hate our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

I think it will only be able to use the ones designed for the A380.


15 posted on 04/25/2006 11:28:08 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

They are not dropping the new 747, I can assure you. But I hope they do this one as well. Put a casino, a couple of bars, a dance pole, etc. ;o)


16 posted on 04/25/2006 11:29:11 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

I'm not sure how valid this publication is. It could simply be a concept at this point, one of many.


17 posted on 04/25/2006 11:29:51 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN

The 777 is a nice ride.


18 posted on 04/25/2006 11:30:11 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit

The 1st will be the USS Enterprise.


19 posted on 04/25/2006 11:30:33 AM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Is this real or is this yet another "paper airplane" story Boeing puts out every time Airbus has some kind of advantage.

I thought the profit point on the a380 was 250 air planes.

with only 140 it seems the a380 is falling short.

This seems more like a popular mechanics fluff story.


20 posted on 04/25/2006 11:30:37 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson