Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Another DeWine Sellout -- This Time on TERRORIST SURVEILLANCE (Vote for Bill Pierce on May 2!)
DeWine Press Release ^ | March 16, 2006 | Mike DeWine

Posted on 05/01/2006 9:30:56 PM PDT by litany_of_lies

Press Release of Senator DeWine

DEWINE, GRAHAM, HAGEL & SNOWE INTRODUCE THE TERRORIST SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 2006

Contact: Mike Dawson


Thursday, March 16, 2006

Today, Senators Mike DeWine (R-OH), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Chuck Hagel (R-NE), and Olympia Snowe (R-ME) introduced the Terrorist Surveillance Act of 2006, a measure that would provide a statutory framework, with congressional and judicial oversight for the President to conduct electronic surveillance on the international communications of suspected terrorists, while protecting the rights and liberties of American citizens.

“As the President has said, when terrorists call the United States, we want to know who they’re talking to. This bill gives the President the limited authority to do just that,” said Senator DeWine, a member of both the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Judiciary Committee. “It does not, however, give the President a blank check. The Terrorist Surveillance Act authorizes a limited, but necessary, program. It requires the President to go to court as soon as possible. And, it establishes an unprecedented Subcommittee with the power to oversee this program and protect the rights and liberties of American citizens.”

“My goal is to ensure the spying program, which has been effective and vital to our national security, is able to continue by ensuring we have the appropriate checks and balances in place,” said Senator Graham. “I believe our legislation strikes that balance and will allow us to continue monitoring the enemy while protecting the rights of American citizens.”

“As communications technology and the terrorist threat evolve, we must ensure the security of the nation by updating our laws. This legislation creates a 21st century law to address 21st century threats," said Senator Hagel, a member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. "We cannot lose our focus on national security. But we must not forget the critical roll that the legislative and judicial branches play in the governance of this nation. This bill ensures substantive Congressional oversight and reinforces the authority of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.” “Today, I join with my colleagues – Senators DeWine, Graham and Hagel – in introducing legislation to bring the NSA’s surveillance program out of the shadows by reasserting the necessary constitutional checks and balances that both the legislative and judicial branches government have over the Executive. Information is the bedrock of this legislation. The more we learn about the NSA program, the better we are able to adopt measures necessary to protect our treasured constitutional rights without sacrificing our safety as a nation. This legislation is the first of many steps, but one that is critical to safeguarding our security and freedom,” said Senator Snowe.

Under the Terrorist Surveillance Act, the President is given the limited authority to conduct surveillance of the international communications of terrorists for 45 days. To engage in such surveillance, the President must have probable cause to believe that the target of surveillance is a member of or affiliated with a terrorist organization. And, he must believe that the surveillance is necessary to protect the United States from a terrorist attack. Under the bill, the President is permitted to reauthorize the Terrorist Surveillance Program every 45 days.

To ensure that the President does not overstep his limited authority, the Terrorist Surveillance Act adds important safeguards to current law to protect the rights and liberties of ordinary Americans.

-- The bill mandates that the President obtain a warrant for surveillance on a suspected terrorist once he has sufficient evidence to do so.

-- For those unusual cases where the President does not have sufficient evidence to obtain a court order, but still wishes to conduct surveillance on a suspect, the bill requires that the Attorney General certify, under oath, that continued surveillance is necessary to protect the United States.

-- Finally, the bill establishes a Terrorist Surveillance Subcommittee within the Senate Intelligence Committee with the exclusive jurisdiction to oversee and monitor the details of the Terrorist Surveillance Program. That Subcommittee is empowered to obtain any and all information about the surveillance of any individual in order to ensure that the President is not abusing the rights of law-abiding Americans.

[BILL EXPLANATION ATTACHED--SEE BELOW]

Terrorist Surveillance Act of 2006 DeWine, Graham, Hagel, Snowe

The Terrorist Surveillance Act provides limited statutory authority to the President to conduct electronic surveillance of suspected terrorists in the United States, greatly enhances Congressional oversight of the Terrorist Surveillance Program, and requires that electronic surveillance be conducted under FISA when the President has sufficient evidence to do so.

• Authorizes the President to conduct an electronic surveillance program, without court order, for up to 45 days, provided that --

-- The President determines that the surveillance is necessary to protect the United States, its citizens, or its interests; -- Protections are in place to ensure that the program is reasonably designed to acquire only international communications; -- There is probable cause to believe that at least one party to a communication is a member of, affiliated with, or working in support of a terrorist organization. The President must submit a list of designated terrorist organizations at least annually; and -- Minimization procedures are in place to limit the acquisition, retention and use of non-public information about U.S. persons.

• Requires Program Review and Reauthorization Every 45 Days

-- Every 45 days, the Attorney General must review the program and certify in writing and under oath whether the program meets the requirements set forth by Congress; -- The President may then reauthorize the program for another 45 day period, but only if he determines that the program remains necessary to protect the United States, its citizens, or its interests. -- The Attorney General must provide notice of the decision to continue or terminate the program to the congressional intelligence committees within 72 hours.

• Requires Review of Surveillance of Individual Targets Every 45 Days

-- Every 45 days, the Attorney General must also review the surveillance of any individual targets under the program. -- If, at any time, the Attorney General determines that he has sufficient evidence to obtain a FISA warrant, he must seek a FISA warrant to continue surveillance on that target. -- If the Attorney General determines that he does not have sufficient evidence to obtain a FISA warrant, but nonetheless wants to continue surveillance, then he must certify in writing and under oath to the Terrorist Surveillance Subcommittees the following four things: 1) that all previous surveillance complied with this Act; 2) that there is insufficient evidence to obtain a warrant under FISA; 3) that the President has determined that continued surveillance of the target without a court order is necessary to protect the United States, its citizens, or its interests; and 4) that continued surveillance is being undertaken in a good faith belief that it will result in the acquisition of foreign intelligence information.

No target may be subject to surveillance beyond the 45-day reauthorization period unless the Attorney General obtains a FISA warrant or files a certification, in writing and under oath, with the Terrorist Surveillance Subcommittees.

• Regular, Ongoing, and Vigorous Oversight of Terrorist Surveillance Program

-- The Act calls for the creation of Terrorist Surveillance Subcommittees within both the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. -- To ensure confidentiality of the Terrorist Surveillance Program, these Subcommittees, along with bipartisan congressional leadership, will have sole oversight responsibilities of this program. -- The President must submit information on the management and operational details of the Terrorist Surveillance Program generally and any specific surveillance conducted by this program whenever requested by the Subcommittees. -- Every 6 months, the President must also submit a report to the Subcommittees, which, among other things, will include: 1) A complete discussion of the management, operational details, effectiveness, and necessity of the program and all electronic surveillance conduced under the program during the 6 month period; 2) Total number of United States persons targeted for electronic surveillance; 3) For any targets subject to surveillance for longer than 45 days, an explanation why the target was subject to continued surveillance without a FISA warrant; and 4) A description of the nature of the information sought under the program, the types of communications subject to the program and whether the information could have been reasonably obtained by less intrusive investigative techniques.

• Program Sunset: 5 years

• Enhanced penalties for disclosure of classified information related to the Terrorist Surveillance Program

-- Maximum fine of $1 million and/or 15 years in prison. This provision does not apply to journalists.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: 109th; attorneygeneral; courts; dewine; fisa; pierce; president; sureillance; terrorism; terrorists; warrant
Here's what one analyst said about this (HT NixGuy):

Now DeWine wants to undercut the presidents authority in the War on Terror.
– The bill mandates that the President obtain a warrant for surveillance on a suspected terrorist once he has sufficient evidence to do so.

We have to get a warrant on Osama Bin Laden if we want to watch him?

Oh, and this is special too -- Note how all terrorist surveillance has to be run through the senate with a probable ten senators, five of them democrats, with their staffers and whoever they talk to. Yeah, that’s a good idea (/sarcasm):
- Finally, the bill establishes a Terrorist Surveillance Subcommittee within the Senate Intelligence Committee with the exclusive jurisdiction to oversee and monitor the details of the Terrorist Surveillance Program. That Subcommittee is empowered to obtain any and all information about the surveillance of any individual in order to ensure that the President is not abusing the rights of law-abiding Americans.

Unfortunately our weak-kneed senator doesn’t have the guts to stand up to the liberal media and the ACLU and their incessant carping about civil rights for terrorists and those who have declared war on the united states and our very existence.

Let’s get someone in office who knows where he stands, the right thing to do, and the guts to do it.

++++++++++++++

Pierce for Senate, for US, for OHIO (site, blog, contribute, collection of position and history posts).

More on Pierce's background and positions is at this previous FR post: HERE

Mike DeWine has only two allies: Apathy, and Inertia. Bill Pierce can crush both of them on May 2, IF Ohio conservatives turn out and vote the issues in the voting booth. Let's roll.

1 posted on 05/01/2006 9:31:04 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies

If I lived in Ohio, I would support Pierce. Mike DeWine is pandering, pure and simple.


2 posted on 05/01/2006 9:32:17 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Bob Taft for Impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight; MikefromOhio; Farmer Dean; ohioWfan; conservative_2001; NeoCaveman; fieldmarshaldj

The latest in Ohio.

Rockin Right, ping away!


3 posted on 05/01/2006 9:33:52 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Bob Taft for Impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies

That bill is veto bait.


4 posted on 05/01/2006 9:36:36 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Proud soldier in the American Army of Occupation..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; RockinRight; MikefromOhio; Farmer Dean; ohioWfan; conservative_2001; NeoCaveman; ..
THERE YOU GUYS ARE! Pass the Ohio word -- Pierce for Senate!

Previous FR Posts on Pierce:

-- Let's Stop Mike DeWine's Election Clock -- Vote for Bill Pierce!
-- Columbus Dispatch Endorses Mike DeWine (NO WAY -- Vote for Bill Pierce!)
-- The Principles of Bill Pierce (Why We Should Vote for Him and Send Mike DeWine Packing on May 2)
-- DeWine’s Attack of Rumsfeld was Wrong! (Senate Candidate Bill Pierce Responds to DeWine's Outrage)
-- Big Oil in congressional cross hairs (DeWine Foolishness-Vote for Bill Pierce and Stop the Madness!)
-- Running Scared in Ohio (RINO DeWine Rips Rumsfeld; yet another reason to vote for Bill Pierce)
-- Press Releases of DeWine Dominated by Pork, Spending (All Reasons to Vote for Bill Pierce on May 2)
-- Bill Pierce, US GOP Senate Candidate to Unseat Mike DeWine in Ohio, on ANWR and Energy
-- Fulton County GOP shuns DeWine (Bill Pierce for Senate!)
-- Bill Pierce for US Senate (Ohio) to Defeat RINO Mike DeWine; Getting Involved

5 posted on 05/01/2006 9:40:34 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
"• Enhanced penalties for disclosure of classified information related to the Terrorist Surveillance Program

-- Maximum fine of $1 million and/or 15 years in prison. This provision does not apply to journalists. "


I see that provision is a green light to Senate leakers to journalists.

What a piece of garbage legislation. Looks like the Imperial Senate is off to another power grab.
6 posted on 05/01/2006 9:43:53 PM PDT by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies

Have you seen the latest Mason Dixon poll? Among other things, it shows that Mike DeWine has pulled 11 points ahead of Sherrod Brown.

Here it is:

http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/elizabeth_auster/index.ssf?/base/opinion/1146299676124791.xml&coll=2

I thought you might find it interesting.


7 posted on 05/01/2006 9:59:09 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Bob Taft for Impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Yes, I saw that, and what that tells me is that there's plenty of room for a conservative to win, even if you buy the theory (which I don't) that a true conservative running against Brown would have a tighter race. I don't agree with that because the right conservative (of which Pierce is one) can get the conservative and center-right base out and overwhen the left and center-left.


8 posted on 05/01/2006 10:04:10 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies

If Bill Pierce were to win the primary, the surprise and ensuing free publicity could give him the momentum to win in November, like it did in 1992 with an underfinanced, little-known legislator named Russell Feingold.

Upsets do still happen.


9 posted on 05/02/2006 9:48:55 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Bob Taft for Impeachment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
That is assuming the media is biased towards him like Carol Mostly Fraud in 1992.

Most likely the media respond to a BIll Pierce victory would be:

Who is Bill Pierce? - Anti-black, anti-gay, anti-Latino, anti-whatever.

Who is Sherrod Brown?

A man who will lower your gas prices.
10 posted on 05/02/2006 9:55:38 AM PDT by Kuksool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; Kuksool

I think Pierce would benefit from the surprise factor (mountains of instant pub) and a fear factor (national GOP would have to back him bigtime in self-defense).

Yes the media would attempt to be rough on him. They're always rough on Republicans once primaries are over, be they RINOs or the genuine article.


11 posted on 05/02/2006 3:08:19 PM PDT by litany_of_lies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson