I have no idea what anything in this article really means, but I thought that by posting it people might think I was smart. Have at it.
To: el_chupacabra
2 posted on
05/12/2006 9:28:14 AM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: el_chupacabra
It means that you forgot to search before posting.
3 posted on
05/12/2006 9:28:57 AM PDT by
Thrusher
("...there is no peace without victory.")
To: el_chupacabra
Somebodys been smoking too much dope. The concept of light moving backwards is meaningless.
4 posted on
05/12/2006 9:31:14 AM PDT by
tomzz
To: el_chupacabra
To: el_chupacabra; Izzy Dunne; Thrusher
Don't let them bother you.
They are faster than light, while you and I are in reverse. ;)
6 posted on
05/12/2006 9:35:29 AM PDT by
G.Mason
(And what is intelligence if not the craft of outthinking our adversaries?)
To: el_chupacabra
After all, this seems to violate Einstein's sacred tenet that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.
"Einstein said information can't travel faster than light, and in this case, as with all fast-light experiments, no information is truly moving faster than light," says Boyd.
If there is a true faster-than-light phenomenon and that phenomenon can be manipulated in a non-ambiguous fashion, then that phenomenon can be used for faster-than-light communication. Although it may be true that no "thing" can travel faster than light, it doesn't follow that there can be no faster-than-light communication because communication doesn't ultimately depend on the sending of a "thing," like a piece of mail, faster than light. It depends upon a shared symbology. So if someone can use a faster-than-light signal to send a short-short-long burst and has assigned a meaning to that phenomenon that is shared between the sender and the recipient so that when the recipient sees short-short-long he knows what the sender is trying to say, faster-than-light communication has been achieved.
8 posted on
05/12/2006 9:37:26 AM PDT by
aruanan
To: el_chupacabra
If we can calculate the speed of light, your post begs the question, "what's the speed of dark?"
16 posted on
05/12/2006 10:33:47 AM PDT by
FDNYRHEROES
(Always bring a liberal to a gunfight)
To: el_chupacabra
somebody has too much time on their hands.
To: el_chupacabra
This seems very similar to a pipe that is already full of some uncompressable liquid?
Or am I nuts?
19 posted on
05/12/2006 11:16:56 AM PDT by
Widdy
To: el_chupacabra
So, if your mom hit you hard enough, she really could knock you into tomorrow.
20 posted on
05/12/2006 1:17:27 PM PDT by
Defiant
(I love Mexico....exactly where it is.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson