Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE(Michelle Malkin opines)
Michelle Malkin.com ^ | May 15, 2006 07:41 AM | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 05/15/2006 7:56:22 AM PDT by kellynla

President Bush is continuing the homeland security dog-and-pony charade in his quest to deliver a massive "guest worker"/amnesty plan to the open-borders lobby. A few weeks ago, Bush's Department of Homeland Security put on a bogus performance of Get Tough Theater with a series of politically timed immigration raids...which, as I predicted, simply resulted in more catch and release of illegal aliens nationwide.

This new last-minute stunt to sprinkle National Guard troops on the border--temporarily, of course, to appease Mexican President Vicente Fox--is more transparent than the Scotch tape used to hold together our dilapidated border fences. (That's only a slight exaggeration.)

For all the new tough talk, these additional troops will be barred from actually doing what needs to be done: guarding the border. President Bush is already bowing and scraping to Mexico over the plan before he's even officially announced it. More details via WaPo:

Officials suggested their mission would be to play a supporting role by providing intelligence, training, transportation, construction and other functions, while leaving the actual guarding of the 2,000-mile line separating the United States and Mexico to the Border Patrol. The National Guard would be a stopgap force until the federal government could hire civilian contractors to take over administrative and support functions from the Border Patrol, freeing more agents to actually hunt for immigrants slipping into the country. Hold up. It's been nearly five years since the Sept. 11 attacks. It's taken the Bush administration this long to acknowledge the need to hire more civilian contractors to relieve the Border Patrol of administrative and support functions?

Only now, on the day the Senate revisits his favored, faltering pet proposals for mass amnesty, does he find it important enough to send a show of military non-force down to the border--

(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: aliens; ballstothewall; buckstopshere; burnflagandgetoverit; bushbasheshimself; bushhasballs; bushhaters; bushhatingismyhobby; bushneedsbashed; callmenancy; clearinghouse2006; conservativebackstab; donkeylovers; durecruits; elephanteatsownhead; gojoinduandstaythere; gopweasels; handitto; hillaryclinton2008; impatientidoits; iwouldstilldoher; kneelbeforehillary; kneelbeforevicente; koolaidisrefreshing; malkin; nationalguard; nothingtodobutbitch; pms; ratlovers; ratstewwithgopmeat; speakerpolosi; thattimeofthemonth; thebasescrewsitself; therats; whatdidclintondo; wisforwimp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-431 next last
To: Steve Van Doorn

Malkin lost the respect of a lot of people when she said that all Muslims in the United States, even those who are natural born Americans, should be put into concentration camps for the rest of their lives. It didn't matter if they were law abiding citizens, they were to be thrown into camps without a trial or any form of appeal.


21 posted on 05/15/2006 8:09:04 AM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
The border isn't the Pressident's fault The States failed to handle the problem YEARS AGO and now want the Feds to bail them out

Is that the new talking point? Now all of a sudden our national border security is a state issue? National defense is one of the FEW responsibilities of the FedGov.

22 posted on 05/15/2006 8:09:13 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
"Sooner or later, they'll move on to some other issue and say it is all "Bush's fault.""

Well, in this case, it is. Bush could have and should have taken steps to deal with this years ago and now that the nations paying attention, there is **nothing** he can do to correct the past. If the current POTUS had a 'D' by his name, there isn't a Republican out there that wouldn't be flaming his/her arse.

Throwing a few rocks into this river isn't going to stop the flow. More importantly, the Dems will have fairly easy time convincing voters to punish the Reps because of it.
23 posted on 05/15/2006 8:10:27 AM PDT by mad puppy ( The Southern border is THE issue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
Is that the new talking point?

No .. I've been saying it for years

The states failed and now they want the Feds to fix it

24 posted on 05/15/2006 8:10:29 AM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: skyman

I hope putting the guard there is temporary, until we can hire and train many thousands more border patrol agents. I served in the Guard and Reserve. Most Guard and Reserve don't have the proper training for "police" functions. I do think the Guard can be used effectively, if they get the right training (generally provided to military police).


25 posted on 05/15/2006 8:11:13 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Regicide

"...do everything he can to thrwart the Minutemen (or as he calls them "vigellantees) including spying on them for the Mexican government. "

Maybe that's the true purpose of the National Guard troops. To provide more accurate information about the location of the minutemen to the Mexican government.

Can anyone tell me when the US government has been this steadfast in refusing to do what the people want?


26 posted on 05/15/2006 8:11:21 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mad puppy
Yeah, it is all Bush's fault.

Illegal immigration started on January 20, 2001 and will end on January 20, 2009.

/sarcasm

27 posted on 05/15/2006 8:11:25 AM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Real Leaders Base Their Decisions on Their Convictions. Wannabes Base Decisions on the Latest Poll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Yep, malkin is really starting to get on my nerves!!


28 posted on 05/15/2006 8:12:42 AM PDT by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; COEXERJ145; Steve Van Doorn; Mo1
The President and the Senate can call their proposal whatever they like but its still an amnesty! And if they pass it, the GOP can kiss its Senate majority good-bye in November. It couldn't happen to a more arrogant bunch of politicians.

I COULDN'T AGREE WITH YOU MORE!

The President and company are just arrogant politicians for coming up with a plan like this! What kind of Conservative Republican pulls a stunt like this??? Here, here!

New One-year Amnesty for Many Pre-1982 Immigrants Starts Today

Today marks the beginning of a one-year application period for thousands of long-term undocumented immigrants throughout the country who were unlawfully turned away by the INS when they attempted to file for legalization during the 1987-88 one-time amnesty signed by President Reagan in 1986.

Center for Human Rights and Constitutional law Los Angeles Press Release

Los Angeles, Ca. Today marks the beginning of a one-year application period for thousands of long-term undocumented immigrants throughout the country who were unlawfully turned away by the INS when they attempted to file for legalization during the 1987-88 one-time amnesty signed by President Reagan in 1986. The 1986 law, the Immigration Control and Reform Act of 1986, granted an unprecedented amnesty to aliens who had resided in the United States since before 1982. The law also for the first time imposed sanctions on employers who hired undocumented workers. Interpreting the new law to disallow most applicants who had briefly traveled abroad after 1982, the INS rejected thousands of applicants who had visited relatives or traveled outside the country during the required period of residence.

Class action lawsuits that were filed during the 1987-88 application period challenging the travel rules were finally settled earlier this year after control of the INS transferred from the Department of Justice to the Department of Homeland Security. Complete copies of the class action settlement agreements are available at the web site of the Citizenship and Immigration Services of DHS (former INS) at uscis.gov (select CIS settlements), and at www.legalizationusa.org.

Under the terms of the settlements in the two class action cases, Catholic Social Services v. Ridge and Newman/LULAC v. CIS, undocumented immigrants who resided in the United States from any date before 1982 until they tried to apply for amnesty and were turned away during the 1987-88 application period, may now come forward and file applications to legalize their status. Under the settlements the applications will be confidential and may not be used to commence deportation proceedings if the application is denied. Applicants will also have the right to seek temporary work permits and permission to travel abroad while their applications are pending.

The settlement agreements take into account the passage of time since class members first applied for amnesty and were turned away. The settlements provide that the CIS may not deny applications simply because they are based upon the affidavits of third parties showing an applicant's required residence from 1982 to 1987-88. To avoid long backlogs of applications before the CIS, the settlements require that applications be processed within 180 days.

"We look forward to thousands of undocumented immigrants all around the country of all nationalities having the opportunity to come forward and legalize their status during the coming year. The INS should have legalized their status fifteen years ago. Their exploitation on the job, discrimination in all walks of life, and fugitive status, will finally come to an end. Their communities will be better off as this population of long-term residents can finally work legally, pay more taxes, and can far more fully participate in social and civic affairs." Peter Schey, President. Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law, lead counsel for plaintiffs.

29 posted on 05/15/2006 8:13:18 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Stay home in November and let the Democrats build that wall lickety -split!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Exactly and anyone who claims Bush has failed on security matters is NOT being honest and they have their own agenda.


30 posted on 05/15/2006 8:13:20 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
You know .. I've had enough of this crap They *itch and complain .. then when he does what they want .. they *itch and complain about that The professional whiners can stick it in their hat as far as I'm concern

Ditto.

31 posted on 05/15/2006 8:13:29 AM PDT by ReaganRevolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

The control of the borders and the security of the country is a federal responsibility, not a state responsibility. I do think it's a state (and local) reponsibility to arrest employers who are knowingly breaking the law and hiring illegals.


32 posted on 05/15/2006 8:13:39 AM PDT by WestSylvanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
If we don't take our own laws seriously, don't expect foreigners to respect this country. Illegal aliens do have a valid point. America hasn't exactly said no to them and in fact the political class wants to reward them. So why shouldn't they be extreme? Its not news.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

33 posted on 05/15/2006 8:13:48 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: WestSylvanian
I do think it's a state (and local) reponsibility to arrest employers who are knowingly breaking the law and hiring illegals.

Have they been doing that???

35 posted on 05/15/2006 8:15:17 AM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Exactly!


37 posted on 05/15/2006 8:15:52 AM PDT by Mo1 (DEMOCRATS: A CULTURE OF TREASON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Regicide

Who does the prosecution in such cases?


38 posted on 05/15/2006 8:16:53 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

"Illegal immigration started on January 20, 2001 and will end on January 20, 2009. "

That's odd logic. So, are you suggesting that since the problem didn't begin on Mr. Bush's watch, he has no responsiblity to fix it?


39 posted on 05/15/2006 8:16:54 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Malesherbes
"Michelle is the energizer bunny; she takes a pounding from the left..."

I didn't know that those pounding her on this thread were leftists. Ahh, that splains it. I do agree that it is a feeble effort (and a temporary one) by President Bush to appease the conservatives. I don't want his appeasement, I want the border problem fixed permanently. I am a firm supporter of Bush, but am greatly disappointed in how he has neglected our borders. It is of great concern to me, not only because of the illegal aliens, but more so because of how easy it is for terrorists to get through. Who's to say hundreds of terrorists haven't already come across the borders from Mexico? That is my biggest concern at this time. I'm afraid it is going to take another 9/11 tragedy before we finally do what we should have been doing ten years ago.
40 posted on 05/15/2006 8:17:01 AM PDT by dmw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-431 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson