Replies

"Quit accusing me of things I've not said....like impeachment or voting for Dems."

OK. Quit accusing me of saying you did. You were talking about people who have been banned and suspended. Many have been banned because they demanded Bush be impeached and they are advocating a Republican loss in 2006.

"Amnesty will ensure a Dem takover of this nation. It is foolhardy to the extreme."

No. It won't. You grossly overestimate the impact of single issue voters deciding not to vote in 2006. Congressional elections are local events.

"A generation ago your views to allow 1-200 million immigrants to swarm in here in a generation would have been laughed at as preposterous. "

What are you talking about. I'm still laughing at the preposterous suggestion that 200 million immigrants will even exist to swarm in here in a generation. And if you can back up your "racist" rhetoric with anything Ed Gillespie has actually said, I will give you just a hair more credibility than the almost zero credibility I currently grant you.

Gillespie is always the point man in calling folks racist or sexist for the White House Rokke.

He has done it for Bush over Harrietgate (I was against), The Port Deal (I was reluctantly for), and several times on this Quasi-Amnesty Plan. Sexist, Racist and Racist respectively.....his terms not mine.

I find it disgusting when a "conservative" administration such as this one uses politically correct race baiting to defend it's unpopular decisions.

The 1-200 million figure in 30 years was opined by the Heritage Foundation (are they no grat around here now too?)yesterday. It is also a number that was been floated by many groups that study immigration and these new laws being proposed.

The only Hispanic voters who vote majority GOP are the Cubans and professional class South Americans....Mexicans who come here in particular tend to vote 2/3rds Democrat.

Bush got a little bump from Texas Mexican descendants many of whom are really Spanish descended anyhow having been here since before there was Texas.

Now if you think that this won't grant a Dem majority lock just as sure as ya'll fear this GOP revolt will then you are allowing your love for George Bush to blind the reality to your eyes.....or maybe you'd just like a Illegally founded Mexican plurality in this nation.

I sure don't and if that puts me at odds with you or this forum then so be it.

I can assure you that once upon a time being nice about George Bush or his daddy was hardly a prerequisite to being a FReeper in Good Standing....lol....like you don't know what I'm talking about.

It used to be about being Conservative, maybe Libertarian a bit, non-racist and no crass cursing or nudity of endless flame wars or stalking. Those were the rules.

This notion that one had to support the GOP or George Bush came about after 9-11 (rightly maybe) and has been cemented home as the banning hammer since immigration became an issue here.

What I can't figure out is how much you guys support amnesty or just support anything Bush does?...blindly and justify it as pragmatism or loyalty

and what is truly funny in a sad way is that nearly all the folks trying to stem unhappiness here over Bush's amnesty were themselves furious and ready to bail and opusing like crazy just a year ago over JR's pro-life Schiavo views. Look at ya'll now....you've found your raison de voire around here

So is it really Love of Bush or support of the Guest Worker Program. I know two of you and realize that two of ya'll are at least not Minority FReepers clamouring for the demise of the gringo....quite a few of those here (some newbies even) though they rarely admit it. I find that rather disingenuous....feint conservatism to cloak an anti-"Anglo" majority culture issue