Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Back to the gold standard?
Asia Times ^ | May 16, 2006 | Peter Morici

Posted on 05/18/2006 3:30:56 PM PDT by Dazedcat

Gold is selling for more than US$700 an ounce, up from $258 in 2001.......

(Excerpt) Read more at atimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gold; goldbugs; goldstandard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: no dems
What about silver? Is that a good investment? I'm new in the investing world but I'm thinking of investing in silver rather than gold. Any advice?

Actually, silver is doing pretty good and it costs a lot less than gold does, but I don't want to give advice since I'm not a financial expert.

Yes, I have gold myself and it's doing okay now, but when I bought gold at the beginning of the Clinton years I certainly didn't have any appreciation of fiat currency.

21 posted on 05/19/2006 10:33:27 PM PDT by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Definition from Websters.

1 : something generally accepted as a medium of exchange, a measure of value, or a means of payment: as a : officially coined or stamped metal currency b : MONEY OF ACCOUNT c : PAPER MONEY

22 posted on 05/20/2006 7:25:16 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Seriously , an examination of how money is created would be useful. If a bank recieves a deposit of $100 and loans out $80 of that then the money supply has just gone up by $80.

That's known as the multiplier effect. The thing about loans is they have to be paid back. Thus, they tend to be self limiting as far as being inflationary.

23 posted on 05/20/2006 7:29:26 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
>>That's known as the multiplier effect. The thing about loans is they have to be paid back. Thus, they tend to be self limiting as far as being inflationary.<<

Actually the normal definition of the multiplier effect has to do with spending, not loans.

In the even of autonomous spending of $100, that hundred dollars goes to someone else who can spend it and so on.

If the system were a perfect consumption society then that $100 dollars would generate economic growth forever.

But there are leaks - the money can be saved or it can be spent overseas. The total of all leaks is called the Marginal Leakage Rate' (mlr).

The multiplier = 1/mlr

Money creation is a separate issue. Whether loans are inflationary depends on whether they are used for consumption spending or something productive.
24 posted on 05/20/2006 9:33:59 AM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
If the system were a perfect consumption society then that $100 dollars would generate economic growth forever.

Without loans, the velocity of money would have to be incredible.

25 posted on 05/20/2006 9:49:14 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson