Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The real threat to U.S. security
Seattle Times ^ | Thursday, March 02, 2006 | Rick Steves

Posted on 05/19/2006 7:37:38 PM PDT by muleskinner

The real threat to U.S. security

By Rick Steves

Special to The Times

Rick Steves

The greatest risk to our society today is not Islamo-fascist terrorism, but the people who use that term to scare us. As the human, fiscal and ecological damage caused by our nation's economic priorities grows, it's becoming clear that we're addicted to more than oil — we're addicted to military spending, too.

The United States spends as much on its military as the rest of humanity combined: more than $400 billion annually (not including the hundreds of billions of dollars for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan). These military expenses are "off limits" as we sharpen our collective pencils to find $39 billion to cut from domestic programs. And yet, despite our already huge military expenditures, these days it's hard to get elected without promising even more military spending.

Recently, San Francisco Supervisor Gerardo Sandoval appeared on the Fox News program "Hannity & Colmes." Frustrated by our government's budget priorities, Sandoval suggested America would be better off without a military. Instead, he said, "we should invest our money in our kids." Right-wing pundits pounced on these statements, and even many prominent Democrats distanced themselves from Sandoval.

Should we abolish the American military altogether? Of course not. But daydream with me for just a moment: What if we gradually scaled down military spending, chose not to rush off to foreign wars based on questionable motives, and began to take the name of our "Department of Defense" literally?.....

(Excerpt) Read more at archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: boycottsteves; farleftist; igotminesteves; islamofascism; leftist; limosineliberal; stevesisabum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: muleskinner
"But daydream with me for just a moment: "

Steve! Screw you, hippie!!

41 posted on 05/19/2006 10:13:27 PM PDT by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

Steves represents the exact approach the democrats will take if they are allowed back into power. The democrap party hates the need for a military so they simply deny we need the military to be strong and powerful. Osama and company are likely pouring over their assets seeking a way to aid the democraps back into power. I look for terrorists attacks this summer, to create -with the ever present aid from the mainstream anti-america media whores- the notion that this administration and Republican leadership in House and Senate hasn't done a thing to thwart Osama's goals so it's time for a change. THAT will be the democrap party theme for 2006 elections, time for a change. Osama's allies in America -the democrap party and mainstream media whoredom- will busy this summer don'tchaknow.


42 posted on 05/19/2006 10:18:38 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner

"The United States spends as much on its military as the rest of humanity combined..."

Um, yeah, we also spend more on potato chips - and pretty much everything else - than all the rest of the world combined.

And about 75% of the UN's charity budget comes from US contributions (nearly all the rest comes from Japan.) Oh, but if we cut back on defense spending then all the horrific problems of all the Socialist refuse dumps we're propping up would miraculously be cured, and they'd suddenly stop trying to commit genocide.

Hell of a plan, there, ace.


43 posted on 05/20/2006 3:32:17 AM PDT by noncommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankiep

I'm laughing out loud at your reply. You make a lot of good points. Apparently whoever taught the guy how to write an essay never taught him to check it for internal contradictions in logic before he submitted it.


44 posted on 05/20/2006 4:03:26 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (Why isn't there an "NRA" for the rest of my rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
But daydream with me for just a moment: What if we gradually scaled down military spending, chose not to rush off to foreign wars based on questionable motives, and began to take the name of our "Department of Defense" literally?.....

Amazing-- Rick Steves and Osama bin Laden have the exact same dream.

45 posted on 05/20/2006 4:07:03 AM PDT by RobFromGa (In decline, the Driveby Media is thrashing about like dinosaurs caught in the tar pits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson