Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Madison Moose
"I disagree with your labeling the attack on Pearl Harbor a terrorist attack. While it was a sneak attack, it was on a legitimate military target."

Would you say, then, that the attack on the USS Cole was not a "terrorist" attack because it was on a legitimate military target?

275 posted on 05/21/2006 7:49:16 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]


To: nightdriver

The point is, I think, that the attack on Pearl Harbor was a government sanctioned event, by troops under a defined hierarchy, wearing visible uniforms.

It was an act of war, not terrorism.

Unless towels on the head is a definable uniform that separates the perpetrators into an easily definable sanctioned military organization, then the attack on the USS Cole was an act of terrorism. Just my opinion.


317 posted on 05/21/2006 8:55:25 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson