Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How ancient whales lost their legs, got sleek and conquered the oceans
EurekAlert (AAAS) ^ | 22 May 2006 | Staff

Posted on 05/23/2006 4:08:38 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

When ancient whales finally parted company with the last remnants of their legs about 35 million years ago, a relatively sudden genetic event may have crowned an eons-long shrinking process.

An international group of scientists led by Hans Thewissen, Ph.D., a professor of anatomy at Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, has used developmental data from contemporary spotted dolphins and fossils of ancient whales to try to pinpoint the genetic changes that could have caused whales, dolphins and porpoises to lose their hind limbs.

More than 50 million years ago the ancestors of whales and dolphins were four-footed land animals, not unlike large dogs. They became the sleek swimmers we recognize today during the next 15 million years, losing their hind limbs in a dramatic example of evolutionary change.

"We can see from fossils that whales clearly lived on land - they actually share a common ancestor with hippos, camels and deer," said team member Martin Cohn, Ph.D., a developmental biologist and associate professor with the UF departments of zoology and anatomy and cell biology and a member of the UF Genetics Institute. "Their transition to an aquatic lifestyle occurred long before they eliminated their hind limbs. During the transition, their limbs became smaller, but they kept the same number and arrangement of hind limb bones as their terrestrial ancestors."

In findings to be published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, scientists say the gradual shrinkage of the whales' hind limbs over 15 million years was the result of slowly accumulated genetic changes that influenced the size of the limbs and that these changes happened sometime late in development, during the fetal period.

However, the actual loss of the hind limb occurred much further along in the evolutionary process, when a drastic change occurred to inactivate a gene essential for limb development. This gene - called Sonic hedgehog - functions during the first quarter of gestation in the embryonic period of the animals' development, before the fetal period.

In all limbed vertebrates, Sonic hedgehog is required for normal limbs to develop beyond the knee and elbow joints. Because ancient whales' hind limbs remained perfectly formed all the way to the toes even as they became smaller suggests that Sonic hedgehog was still functioning to pattern the limb skeleton.

The new research shows that, near the end of 15 million years, with the hind limbs of ancient whales nonfunctional and all but gone, lack of Sonic hedgehog clearly comes into play. While the animals still may have developed embryonic hind limb buds, as happens in today's spotted dolphins, they didn't have the Sonic hedgehog required to grow a complete or even partial limb, although it is active elsewhere in the embryo.

The team also showed why Sonic hedgehog became inactive and all traces of hind limbs vanished at the end of this stage of whale evolution, said Cohn. A gene called Hand2, which normally functions as a switch to turn on Sonic hedgehog, was shown to be inactive in the hind limb buds of dolphins. Without it, limb development grinds to a halt.

"By integrating data from fossils with developmental data from embryonic dolphins, we were able to trace these genetic changes to the point in time when they happened," Thewissen said.

"Studies on swimming in mammals show that a sleek body is necessary for efficient swimming, because projecting organs such as rudimentary hind limbs cause a lot of drag, and slow a swimmer down," said Thewissen, who spends about a month every year in Pakistan and India collecting fossils that document the land-to-water transition of whales.

Researchers say the findings tend to support traditional evolutionary theory, a la Charles Darwin, that says minor changes over vast expanses of time add up to big changes. And while Sonic hedgehog's role in the evolution of hind limbs in ancient whales is becoming apparent, it is still not fully defined.

"It's clear when ancient whales lost all vestiges of the limb it was probably triggered by loss of Sonic hedgehog," said Clifford Tabin, Ph.D., a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School who was not involved in the research. "But it's hard to say for certain because you're looking at events long after they occurred. As they suggest, there could have been a continual decrease in Sonic as the limbs reduced until the modern version of the animal arrived."

The study itself, combining fossil and developmental data, is notable, Tabin said.

"Whales went through this remarkable transformation to become more like the ancestral fish," Tabin said. "Convergence of evolutionary studies and developmental genetics give us another piece in this growing tapestry of how genetic changes lead to morphological change. It is a remarkable process that was achieved simply and led to profound consequences in how whales were able to survive. Only now in the last five years are we developing this understanding of how the world of evolution is controlled genetically."

###

In addition to UF and Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine, scientists from the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the Indian Institute of Technology were involved in the research. Financial support was provided by the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health and the Indian Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: crevolist; junk; pavlovian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-365 next last
To: Doctor Stochastic
If two (or more) parts happen to latch on to each other, the whole bag becomes full of that configuration.

And in organic chemistry, they can't help doing so. The oceans quickly fill with sub-assemblies of organic molecules.

41 posted on 05/23/2006 9:09:46 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sittnick

Wilma?


42 posted on 05/23/2006 9:13:34 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest
I don't believe it.

I should hope not. Wristwatch parts don't replicate.

43 posted on 05/23/2006 9:16:42 AM PDT by shuckmaster (An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trebb
isn't it reasonable to assume that there would be the occasional "throwback" that exhibited the properties of an earlier version?Sure. That's where hen's teeth and horses toes come from.
44 posted on 05/23/2006 9:21:48 AM PDT by shuckmaster (An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
Wristwatch parts don't replicate.

These, however, do.


45 posted on 05/23/2006 9:23:06 AM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Amazing (not). Now if they could just explain how half of a whale/dolphin brain falls asleep at a time so the creature doesn't drown we might be on to something. Hint: it really is a big deal, because each hemisphere must have the necessary tracts and nucleii for full function. That's something that isn't present in human brains, btw.

There's a great deal about science that members of the Darwin fan club won't - or perhaps can't - understand.
46 posted on 05/23/2006 9:25:09 AM PDT by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

Scary. What do you call that thing?


47 posted on 05/23/2006 9:28:59 AM PDT by shuckmaster (An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Senator Bedfellow
"By integrating data from fossils with developmental data from embryonic dolphins, we were able to trace these genetic changes to the point in time when they happened," Thewissen said.

I'm sorry, but this can't possibly be true. Everyone knows that Haeckel guy was a fraud, so therefore embryology can never, ever, ever tell us anything at all about evolution. Or something.

What's more Intelligent Denial proponents assure us that "Darwinists" NEVER conduct studies into the actual history of genetic/molecular changes, so obviously none of this article can be true.

48 posted on 05/23/2006 9:31:00 AM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

Then it is based on the game, I thought that was just a coincidence. I see now, its biologists just having a little fun. Those molecular biologists are wild and crazy guys lol.


49 posted on 05/23/2006 9:31:11 AM PDT by OmegaMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: All
Evolution at sea bump:


50 posted on 05/23/2006 9:32:53 AM PDT by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeepUSfree
I'm ALWAYS amazed when these folks think that MAN knows better than GOD. God set it up this way, all we have to do is live by the rules. Figuring out those rules is what science does. To deny obvious truths spread about you by the creator is blasphemous!

You tell him!

51 posted on 05/23/2006 9:33:15 AM PDT by Frapster (Don't mind me - I'm distracted by the pretty lights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster

It's a replicator from StarGate. They eat up any available metal and turn it into new replicators. When they're done with a planet it's just rock covered in layers and layers of replicator tiles.


52 posted on 05/23/2006 9:34:08 AM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ahayes

This is why humans are sometimes born with little tails.



Correction:
Humans are born because someone got a little tail.


53 posted on 05/23/2006 9:38:38 AM PDT by WKB (D.L. Moody "The Bible was not written for your information, but for your transformation")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WKB

I am shocked, SHOCKED!! :-o


54 posted on 05/23/2006 9:40:19 AM PDT by ahayes (Yes, I have a devious plot. No, you may not know what it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: russdawg
"How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild and Got a Life" this sounds familiar and about as credible

So, what? You mean it's not credible that whales, over 15 millions years, reduced and eventually lost their rear limbs?

If so, then precisely which of the rear limbed whales do you suggest ISN'T really a whale?

It would really help if you could clarify this, since antievolutionists have been all over the map. For instance they typically claimed, for years and years, that the common Eocene whale, Basilosaurus Isis, was "just a whale," and therefore did not provide any evidence of evolution despite the primitive nature of its skull morphology and etc wrt modern whales.

But then Basilorsaurs turned out to be the first whale discovered to have (tiny but perfectly formed) rear limbs. The creationist fossil "expert" Duane Gish, who had formerly dismissed the same creature as "just a whale," and had ridiculed the notion that any whale could have rear limbs, was thrown into such a panic that he suddenly declared that Basilosaurus wasn't even a mammal, let alone a whale, but some sort of reptile!!!

55 posted on 05/23/2006 9:46:09 AM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: ahayes
The replicators of course evolved into something less scarier though...


56 posted on 05/23/2006 9:53:17 AM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
Neither do I believe the Darwinists subjective nonsense.

Activity (or lack thereof in modern ceteceans) of "Sonic Hedgehog" gene = OBJECTIVE.

Studies of embryological development in living ceteceans = OBJECTIVE.

Existence of fossil whales with rear limbs (in various stages of development, with larger, more functional and more complete ones generally earlier geologically) = OBJECTIVE.

So what's "subjective"?

57 posted on 05/23/2006 9:55:56 AM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Maybe it's just me, but there has to be a good story how sonic hedgehog got it's name.


58 posted on 05/23/2006 9:59:33 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Maybe it's just me, but there has to be a good story how sonic hedgehog got it's name.

Wouldja believe it? Wikipedia has this: Sonic hedgehog, which says: "... sonic hedgehog was named for Sega's video game character Sonic the Hedgehog."

59 posted on 05/23/2006 10:15:20 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Unresponsive to trolls, lunatics, fanatics, retards, scolds, & incurable ignoramuses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

thxs, PH for the ping. :^)


60 posted on 05/23/2006 10:15:58 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you....... :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-365 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson