Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paleo Conservative

They want longer flights?

I know very little about aviation. However, why couldn't tankers be used?


39 posted on 05/26/2006 7:15:37 AM PDT by El Gran Salseron (The FR Canteen's Resident Equal Opportunity Male Chauvinist Pig! :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: El Gran Salseron
I know very little about aviation. However, why couldn't tankers be used?

I don't think very many passengers could afford what it costs to operate an aerial refueling tanker. I read a report on fuel efficiency and its effects on military operations. It said that a gallon of jet fuel costs about $17 when delivered by tanker compared to a couple of dollars to load that same fuel from a depot on the ground. There's also an element of danger involved with aerial refueling. There's a risk of two maybe more aircraft crashing. There's a reason Air Force One has never been refueled in the air while the President was on board. In fact the Air Force usually doesn't even practice refueling with either of the VC-25's. They use the E-4's to avoid damaging the paint on Air Force One.

54 posted on 05/26/2006 12:32:05 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson