Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

QUID PRO COAL 2: CLINTON CORRUPTION + THE SEQUESTRATION OF GASEOUS FOSSILS (hillary does coal@NPC)
Alamo-Girl, Loretta Lynn, laissez-fairerepublic.com, National Press Club, C-SPAN | 5.29.06 | Mia T

Posted on 05/28/2006 9:36:07 PM PDT by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Sic Luceat Lux

WHY HILLARY IN THE OVAL OFFICE IS A NATIONAL-SECURITY NO-NOPART ONE
EXPENSIVE CHINA: the clinton legacy

by Mia T et al, 10.17.03, 03.01.06

It is no secret that Hillary's past takes us through a pile of hard, cold cash from the Chinese army, Chinese army agents roaming the White House and photos with a wide variety of scoundrels.

For example, the one prominent name missing from Hillary's recent "tell-all" book is Riady. Mrs. Clinton failed to mention the Riady family at all. One would get the impression that the Riadys were not present in the Clinton White House. Hillary Clinton certainly overlooked listing the table settings and menus for White House dinners with the Riadys.

The Riadys knew the Clintons from their Arkansas years, when Moctar bought out a local bank. Moctar and his son James were close to Bill and Hillary through 1992 and into the White House. Moctar even owned the firm selected by Hillary Clinton to replace the White House travel office.

Riady and Hillary

Moctar and James Riady played a key role in bringing the Clintons to power in Washington. The Indonesian billionaire and his Lippo banking company managed to contribute large sums of money to the Clintons' campaigns even though it was against the law. Moctar's gardener contributed $450,000 directly to Bill Clinton in a single check. James Riady, Moctar's son, eventually pleaded guilty to campaign violations.

The connections between the Riadys and the Clintons have a much more sinister theme than simple foreign money inside U.S. elections. Testimony before the U.S. Senate revealed Moctar Riady's involvement in Chinese espionage. The Lippo Group is in fact a joint venture of China Resources, a trading and holding company "wholly owned" by the Chinese communist government and used as a front for Chinese espionage operations.

Mrs. Clinton not only knew the Riadys but took their money as well. To prove my point I need only to cite photographic evidence. Her picture with Moctar Riady is certainly damning evidence of a relationship that spanned several bank accounts and two decades. It is often said that a picture tells a thousand words. However, Hillary's pictures not only tell stories left out of her book but they also netted $10,000 each for the DNC in illegal donations.

Hillary's Most-Wanted

Mrs. Clinton has left us with a wide selection of photo evidence. Mrs. Clinton has had her photo taken with drug dealer Jorge Cabrera. Jorge donated a load of drug money to the DNC in order to get close to the first lady. Jorge is currently serving federal time for smuggling 3,000 pounds of cocaine into the United States.

READ MORE

41 posted on 05/29/2006 11:13:19 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I think I will say this again:

"Thus, clinton mediocrity goes undetected primarily because of media mediocrity. ("Mediocrity" and "media" don't come from the same Latin root (medius) for no reason.) Insofar as the clintons are concerned, the media confuse form with substance, smoothness with coherence, data-spewing with ratiocination, pre-programmed recitation with real-time analysis, an idiosyncratic degeneracy with creativity."

Best FRegards,

42 posted on 05/29/2006 11:16:42 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Most Congressmen are excellent Bovine Scatologist's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

thanx :)


43 posted on 05/29/2006 11:42:01 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Sic Luceat Lux; Alamo-Girl; All

.

Just as we Citizen-Activists were gaining headway in 1997 in stopping the City of Long Beach from turning over our U.S. Long Beach Navy Base to the Communist Chinese for their cash going to the CLINTON White House...

...both Sen. BARBARA BOXER & DIANE FEINSTEIN (D) publically announced they were giving back the $10,000 in China Army money they had recieved. A week later Rep. LORETTA SANCHEZ (D) announced that she was also going to return her $1,000 contribution from the Communist Chinese.

In his plea agreement hearing in U.S. Federal Court 5 years ago JAMES RIADY stated under oath that not a single nickel in China Army money had been returned to him by the Democrats. JOHNNY CHUNG also confirmed that the $1,000 in Communist Chinese money he gave to Rep. LORETTA SANCHEZ had not been returned either.

After we helped Congress stop President CLINTON from turning our U.S. Long Beach Navy Base over to the Communist Chinese, Friend of HILLARY Long Beach Mayor BEVERLY O'NEILL (D) publically announced that she was going to flatten it anyway. Even though she had no firm planned usage for it afterwards in the Port of Long Beach, California.

As the Communist Chinese smiled broadly as an important Pacific Rim Naval support base in the fight over the future of a Free Taiwan nation was going away.

.


44 posted on 05/29/2006 12:04:41 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

LOL -- a witty rejoinder!


45 posted on 05/29/2006 12:14:36 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe; Mia T
Kosovo coal deposits?

Funny, and I thought her interest in provoking (er, promoting) a war there was ti

(1) distract attention from the impeachment that had been defeated a few weeks before

(2) get pictures of refugees and railroad cars for her NY jewish promotions dept for her upcoming campaign as a socially-conscious liberal

(3) finish her coordination and re-invention campaign hashed out with the news media in a week-long, closed-door White House conference (that nobody has YET to comment on!)
46 posted on 05/29/2006 12:37:44 PM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Note these are similar to the deposits at Escalante Staircase National Monument: low sulfur, low ash lignite, near surface with low overburden. Tough for the Serbs to strip mine coal in the middle of a war, though. And that left the Lippo group (Riyadys) with the market. What a two-fer. Payola and a dog-wag.
47 posted on 05/29/2006 1:16:27 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sic Luceat Lux
...Suen Yan Kwong, was the founder of Chung Kiu Telecommunication, which had invested in cellular telecommunications for use under special network by China's People's Liberation Army (PLA) in military districts along the coastal provinces," noted the December 2002 State Department charge letter.

It is amazing that a company based inside a Macao hotel owned by Ng Lapseng would contract with a U.S.-based satellite company when its owner was then also in business supplying communications to the Chinese army. Even more amazing is the Clintons' silence on Ng Lapseng and the money that somehow slipped out of his pockets and into DNC coffers at the same time.

Hmmmmmmm, what does Hillary have to say?

48 posted on 05/29/2006 2:16:33 PM PDT by GOPJ (''We are a nation that has a government -- not the other way around.'' -Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

thank you :)


49 posted on 05/29/2006 3:21:09 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
There is a process called coal gassification where you can turn coal into synthetic gasoline. the Germans during WWII, used this method for their supply of diesel and high octane gasoline fuel. The South Africans currently use this method for their diesel supply. Its a gritty process because low grade coal is used, but if you use "clean coal" is used maybe we can augment our tight gasoline supply. Shell Oil is currently researching this to increase their market.

http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fischer-Tropsch
http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_oil
http://www.fe.doe.gov/aboutus/history/syntheticfuels_history.html
50 posted on 05/29/2006 4:27:18 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Audaces Fortuna Ivat-Fortune Favors the Brave/Virgil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthetic_fuel


51 posted on 05/29/2006 4:32:31 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Audaces Fortuna Ivat-Fortune Favors the Brave/Virgil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Blade Runner is good representation of the effects of a Clinton Dynasty. Consider also Terry Guilame's "BRAZIL" swat teams of HVAC repairmen with powers of arrest and secret detention. Much more on point with the mentality that holds as one of its deepest ideals the attempted regulation of CO2 gas release, based upon AL Gore's liberal arts D minus "understanding" of basic science.


52 posted on 05/29/2006 5:18:18 PM PDT by Gail Wynand (Why not "virtual citizenship"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gail Wynand

excellent. bump.

'hillarycare on wheels' is what Charles Krauthammer tonight called hillary clinton's energy 'plan.'

This jackboot will tax to death anything she can't directly quash.


53 posted on 05/29/2006 6:38:33 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

thanks.

I wonder if the requisite wood-based fuels makes this process a non-starter, politically....


54 posted on 05/29/2006 6:53:09 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker
very interesting. I wonder if these processes can ever be economically viable without subsidies?
55 posted on 05/29/2006 7:02:01 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jla

fyi


56 posted on 05/29/2006 7:25:26 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
In the beginning you might need a governmental subsidies but when more people invest in those companies you can eliminate them. Similar when the US government invested in space program in the 1960s. When more people begin to use the fuel and profits begin to rise then the government can cut its investment. Possibly for their trouble that the government gets a percentage of the profits for its investment in research and development. Or you can form a conglomerate of companies to subsidize the development of the technology like Shell Deutschland Oil
57 posted on 05/29/2006 8:14:39 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Audaces Fortuna Ivat-Fortune Favors the Brave/Virgil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Sic Luceat Lux

Thank you so much for the encouragement and the information!


58 posted on 05/29/2006 8:41:19 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

I was considering economic viability from a different angle, i.e., whether the cost in terms of fuel expended exceeds the return in terms of fuel produced.


59 posted on 05/29/2006 8:51:16 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

I understand. Cost will be expensive at first but over time as demand increases prices will drop. It will give people a choice bewtween a product that supports contries like Iran, who are using American dollars to build their nuclear ambutions and a product that is "Made in the USA". I rather have the my dollar stay here in the United States.


60 posted on 05/29/2006 8:55:34 PM PDT by garbageseeker (Audaces Fortuna Ivat-Fortune Favors the Brave/Virgil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson