Skip to comments.
Ted Kennedy: Build 'Wind Farm' Elsewhere [Arrogant NIMBY alert]
NewsMax ^
| May 31, 2006
| NewsMax
Posted on 06/01/2006 6:04:15 AM PDT by upchuck
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: upchuck
This is gonna cause some fratricidal warfare. IIRC, the Forbes family (as in John
Forbes Kerry) owns Naushon Island.
I can hardly wait... he he he.
21
posted on
06/01/2006 6:24:41 AM PDT
by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: angkor
22
posted on
06/01/2006 6:26:13 AM PDT
by
Unicorn
(Too many wimps around.)
To: Vaquero
23
posted on
06/01/2006 6:26:20 AM PDT
by
thile44
(Simplicity is too complex.)
To: trashcanbred
I dunno what their problem would be.... Once established those stanchions should actually support more biomass than the natural area. If you've ever seen underwater videos of an oil rig, you can see they become an oasis and support increased aquatic life. That's why fisherman love them.
This Wind Farm is supposed to eliminate a coal fired powerplant...What does that do for the Carbon footprint equation? That's the main thing here.
24
posted on
06/01/2006 6:26:32 AM PDT
by
Wristpin
("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
To: metesky
I think a wind farm next to Kennedy would generate slightly more power than a wind farm next to Kerry.
To: upchuck
To: upchuck
SAVE THE WORLD!!!
But don't mess with my view.
27
posted on
06/01/2006 6:40:45 AM PDT
by
sandbar
To: upchuck
complained that the project would be built in one of the familys favorite sailing and yachting areas.
On the plus side, adding the windmills will give them more things to run into. :)
28
posted on
06/01/2006 6:40:53 AM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: trashcanbred
I have read that the windfarm would cause serious problems for the fishermen of the area.
I've never heard of them being a detriment to fishing...just a big coon...or boon rather. :)
29
posted on
06/01/2006 6:42:22 AM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: upchuck
When Kennedy was ask if he liked the idea of a wind farm he replied "if it's a new drink that has Cutty Sark in it I am all for it. Otherwise forget it".
30
posted on
06/01/2006 6:47:20 AM PDT
by
reagandemo
(The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
To: upchuck
Instead Robert Kennedy Jr., who had been beating the drum for alternative sources of energy for more than a decade, complained that the project would be built in one of the familys favorite sailing and yachting areas. And John F. "Splash" Kennedy Jr.'s last ditch effort.
31
posted on
06/01/2006 6:55:50 AM PDT
by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.)
To: upchuck
32
posted on
06/01/2006 7:05:15 AM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: trashcanbred
33
posted on
06/01/2006 7:08:20 AM PDT
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: upchuck
Limousine Liberal S.O.P.
34
posted on
06/01/2006 7:45:51 AM PDT
by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: upchuck
And yet Kennedy and the rest of the limousine liberals continue to get away with this kind of hypocrisy time after time with nary a peep from the MSM.
One can only imagine the hellfire and damnation that would rain down upon a REPUBLICAN should he be so bold as to pull a Kennedy like this and try to get away with it.
35
posted on
06/01/2006 7:51:11 AM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(Support American sovereignty - boycott employers of illegal aliens)
To: upchuck
Rush (Maha Rushie, El Rushbo, America's Truth Detector, etc.) has called wind turbines "useless pinwheels."
Therefore, those who hang on his every word summarily dismiss them as environmentalist whacko nonsense.
36
posted on
06/01/2006 7:54:13 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(Repeal all Amendments after XV. Yes, ALL of them. Yes, I mean that one, too.)
To: upchuck
"the familys favorite sailing and yachting areas"
Oh, the horror!
To: cotton1706
Although the article said they would only be running for a certain percentage of the time. The limitation on run-time was due to the estimates on how often the wind would be strong enough to provide power.
I read that article, and the author (Koch) made a good economic argument against it -- saying that the project didn't make economic sense in terms of the cost to produce electricity and the percentage of time the wind would be strong enough. That's entirely different than the Kennedy/Kerry positions, which come across as entirely self-interested NIMBY. Aside from that article in the Wall Street Journal, everything else makes me want the project.
To: cotton1706
There was a piece in the WSJ on this. It said that the cost of this windfarm would exceed the benefit and might actually cost customers more in the long run. Pretty much true of any wind or solar project.
39
posted on
06/01/2006 8:22:36 AM PDT
by
Ditto
To: upchuck
All of those, and some that cannot be printed here.....
40
posted on
06/01/2006 8:28:00 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(You can't have everything....where would you put it?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson