Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Kennedy: Build 'Wind Farm' Elsewhere [Arrogant NIMBY alert]
NewsMax ^ | May 31, 2006 | NewsMax

Posted on 06/01/2006 6:04:15 AM PDT by upchuck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: upchuck
This is gonna cause some fratricidal warfare. IIRC, the Forbes family (as in John Forbes Kerry) owns Naushon Island.

I can hardly wait... he he he.

21 posted on 06/01/2006 6:24:41 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angkor

BTTT


22 posted on 06/01/2006 6:26:13 AM PDT by Unicorn (Too many wimps around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Priceless!


23 posted on 06/01/2006 6:26:20 AM PDT by thile44 (Simplicity is too complex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred

I dunno what their problem would be.... Once established those stanchions should actually support more biomass than the natural area. If you've ever seen underwater videos of an oil rig, you can see they become an oasis and support increased aquatic life. That's why fisherman love them.

This Wind Farm is supposed to eliminate a coal fired powerplant...What does that do for the Carbon footprint equation? That's the main thing here.


24 posted on 06/01/2006 6:26:32 AM PDT by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: metesky

I think a wind farm next to Kennedy would generate slightly more power than a wind farm next to Kerry.


25 posted on 06/01/2006 6:29:49 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

26 posted on 06/01/2006 6:34:57 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

SAVE THE WORLD!!!

But don't mess with my view.


27 posted on 06/01/2006 6:40:45 AM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
complained that the project would be built in one of the family’s favorite sailing and yachting areas.”

On the plus side, adding the windmills will give them more things to run into. :)
28 posted on 06/01/2006 6:40:53 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred
I have read that the windfarm would cause serious problems for the fishermen of the area.

I've never heard of them being a detriment to fishing...just a big coon...or boon rather. :)
29 posted on 06/01/2006 6:42:22 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
When Kennedy was ask if he liked the idea of a wind farm he replied "if it's a new drink that has Cutty Sark in it I am all for it. Otherwise forget it".
30 posted on 06/01/2006 6:47:20 AM PDT by reagandemo (The battle is near are you ready for the sacrifice?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Instead Robert Kennedy Jr., who had been beating the drum for alternative sources of energy for more than a decade, complained that the project would be built in one of the family’s favorite sailing and yachting areas.”

And John F. "Splash" Kennedy Jr.'s last ditch effort.

31 posted on 06/01/2006 6:55:50 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

32 posted on 06/01/2006 7:05:15 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred
 

33 posted on 06/01/2006 7:08:20 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Limousine Liberal S.O.P.
34 posted on 06/01/2006 7:45:51 AM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
And yet Kennedy and the rest of the limousine liberals continue to get away with this kind of hypocrisy time after time with nary a peep from the MSM.

One can only imagine the hellfire and damnation that would rain down upon a REPUBLICAN should he be so bold as to pull a Kennedy like this and try to get away with it.
35 posted on 06/01/2006 7:51:11 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Support American sovereignty - boycott employers of illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Rush (Maha Rushie, El Rushbo, America's Truth Detector, etc.) has called wind turbines "useless pinwheels."

Therefore, those who hang on his every word summarily dismiss them as environmentalist whacko nonsense.


36 posted on 06/01/2006 7:54:13 AM PDT by newgeezer (Repeal all Amendments after XV. Yes, ALL of them. Yes, I mean that one, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

"the family’s favorite sailing and yachting areas"

Oh, the horror!


37 posted on 06/01/2006 7:54:44 AM PDT by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Although the article said they would only be running for a certain percentage of the time.

The limitation on run-time was due to the estimates on how often the wind would be strong enough to provide power.

I read that article, and the author (Koch) made a good economic argument against it -- saying that the project didn't make economic sense in terms of the cost to produce electricity and the percentage of time the wind would be strong enough. That's entirely different than the Kennedy/Kerry positions, which come across as entirely self-interested NIMBY. Aside from that article in the Wall Street Journal, everything else makes me want the project.

38 posted on 06/01/2006 8:11:54 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really needed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
There was a piece in the WSJ on this. It said that the cost of this windfarm would exceed the benefit and might actually cost customers more in the long run.

Pretty much true of any wind or solar project.

39 posted on 06/01/2006 8:22:36 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
All of those, and some that cannot be printed here.....
40 posted on 06/01/2006 8:28:00 AM PDT by b4its2late (You can't have everything....where would you put it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson