To: angkor
Ok.
now, knowing that the Antarctic land mass has moved a long ways since the breakup of the original continental masses, why did the mass they found underneath stay with the surface rock?
18 posted on
06/01/2006 2:35:21 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
why did the mass they found underneath stay with the surface rock?Global cooling??
Uhhhhhh.... global warming?
Dunno. I wuz joking.
25 posted on
06/01/2006 2:40:03 PM PDT by
angkor
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Not sure I understand what you're asking. Can you explain?
181 posted on
06/02/2006 7:31:11 PM PDT by
Gondring
(If a "Conservative" now wants to "conserve" our Constitution away, then I must be a Preservative!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson