Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nightrider
Did I say she did? I said if she did, then she is subject to a civil suit, not censorship. Under Falwell v. Hustler, it's dubious this was even slander - though it is crass, tasteless, and an embarassment to Ms. Coulter.

In the interests of disclosure, however, I should mention that I am not a fan of Coulter's. Not since I saw her lose a debate last year to Janet Reno - and Reno wasn't exactly a master debater either. While Reno had nothing but platitudes, those platitudes at least formed a coherent argument. Coulter had only insults, some of which made the entire audience gasp.

48 posted on 06/11/2006 9:51:42 AM PDT by jude24 ("I will oppose the sword if it's not wielded well, because my enemies are men like me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: jude24

well, then, were you insinuating she slandered?

how is it an embarrassment?


58 posted on 06/11/2006 9:56:11 AM PDT by Nightrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: jude24
Embarrassment? Those 4 women rode their husbands caskets to wealth and fame. They CAMPAIGNED for John Kerry. The b*tches are pure sleeze and Ann Coulter was DEAD on. These shmucks are no better then Cindy Sheehan.
92 posted on 06/11/2006 10:10:46 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: jude24

"I said if she did, then she is subject to a civil suit"

Bring it on!!


98 posted on 06/11/2006 10:12:22 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson