Well, I'm not sure how you read that into this article - perhaps you could enlighten me. If this father deliberately put his young son into a known harms way, I would say that is despicable - and I'm not talking about the normal unpredictable hazards of life that affect everyone such as the dangers of crossing the road OR being met by a group of hoodlums in a dark alley. However, I would suggest that regardless of what the views are of any party in any dispute, there should be a reasonable expectation of safety for an innocent child. By not being able to make that assumption, the school and the state have not lived up to their responsibilities - and I hope they get their butt sued off.
It's not complicated at all.
This guy had a confrontation with the school administration A YEAR ago in an effort to have his kid excluded from the pro-homosexual indoctrination classes.
They flat out refused his demands.
Now if this guy is so convinced that this sort of curriculum is harmful to children, why on earth would he leave his kid in this school for ANOTHER YEAR.
If he was so committed to preventing kids from being exposed to this stuff, then he was either a total hypocrite for leaving his kid there, OR he was using the kid to further his own personal political agenda with no real concern for the kid's welfare...which makes him a hypocrite ANYWAY.