Posted on 06/16/2006 9:13:55 AM PDT by Pyro7480
HPV Vaccine—Another Deception of the Culture of Death
The big news recently is that the FDA has just approved a new vaccine supposedly to inoculate women against cervical cancer. Predictably, the media and health professionals are touting this as the greatest thing since the Salk vaccine, but they are also engaging in a propaganda campaign aimed at distorting the public’s perception of it. I for one will stand against what I consider this newest marriage of the culture of death with junk science, and I believe we all should. In the next few weeks I intend to examine a number of aspects of this Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine for the benefit of parents who may some day be coerced into getting their kids vaccinated with it.
Let me start by pointing out a few basic elements of this vaccine and its service as a tool of the culture of death. First of all, did you ever wonder why all of a sudden we need a vaccine for just one sexually transmitted disease? Just to give you a little perspective: in the nineteen sixties, before the advent of the birth control pill and other forms of abortion-causing drugs, there were only three sexually transmitted diseases which at that time were known as venereal diseases, a name derived from Venus, the pagan goddess of sexual promiscuity. Because of the exponential increase in illicit sexual activity in the past four decades, the number of distinct sexually transmitted diseases has risen to over thirty, not to mention the multiple strains of the distinct diseases. The Human Papilloma Virus, for example, is just one sexually transmitted disease, but it has over 100 different strains! Only a small number of these strains actually lead to cancer and most of its victims don’t know they have it and cure themselves over time.
Now, to put it into even clearer perspective: the much-touted HPV vaccine treats only two strains of HPV and two strains of genital warts. This is a tour-de-force against HPV isn’t it?
The most wretched hypocrisy of the promoters of this vaccine, however, is that, rather than calling it a vaccine against a couple strains of one of the dozens of sexually transmitted diseases, they are calling it a vaccine against cervical cancer. Well, it will certainly protect some women from cervical cancer in the future but that’s not the point. The point is that there are overwhelming numbers of diseases, strains and even cancers that this vaccine does not protect from, all of which are gotten by the very same sexual act. Thinking that this vaccine gives blanket protection against cervical cancer (which of course is how it’s perceived because that is how it’s being promoted) is like believing that thirty people jumping out of the same airplane will all be protected because one of them is wearing a parachute.
This HPV vaccine, my friends, is a classic case of the culture of death playing fast and loose with people’s lives. They use junk science to hook our terribly un-reflective culture on a promise that will benefit only a miniscule portion of the population, and then the false perception of security surrounding their newest ruse hooks everyone else into behaviors and lifestyles that perpetuate the damage and decay our decency.
Don’t fall for it because pretty soon they will be forcing you—and your kids—to drink their potions to the dregs.
Try to read here
http://www.nccc-online.org/survivors.php
"Oh, just for fun....go to the cemetary and check the numbers of children's headstones from 1900 until today....and see the difference in the numbers each decade."
That's only marginally related to vaccination. The biggest change in that has been because of infant mortality.
BTW, the US is currently #36 in world ranking for infant mortality. We are behind places like Czech Republic, Slovenia, Malta, and Cuba.
You're treading a fine line. For some, abstinence is the solution. For others, they evaluate their risks, the benefit from the poor (90%) effectiveness then go out and get it anyway or some other disease. Give parents ALL the information, not just the "right" (i.e. politically correct) information.
part of the issue of "admit it" - if you disagree outright on some of these boards and try to have a meaningful discussion, the zealots on both sides of the argument come out in start making all sorts of personal attacks and characterizations and the rest of the afternoon is spent in sniping contests and false arguments.
But I don't admit it since I don't agree with all of the underlying science of the modern theory.
Nowdays, duck are vaccinated against mango salsa.
As I told, if you think that teens won't have sex because their parents tell them, then I have a bridge to sell you in Brooklyn... Cheap...
In my rural family graveyard, there's a row of headstones for four children who died within a few weeks of each other in the 1920s...of diptheria. Would have been my great-aunts and uncles.
We have a vaccine for diptheria now.
You didn't read my post did you? People believe very strongly in things sometimes which may not save them. You mentioned smallpox. Do you know why they pulled the vaccine off the market a couple of years ago? Because people in healthcare were getting vaccinated and dying and having severe problems because of it.
Be careful where you put your trust. Some vaccines have been proven useful; others have not. You can flame away in your ignorance all you want but vaccines are not a 100% solution; they have risks for some people which have to be weighed just like most things in life.
No. The big drop came after mass vaccination. There was a small drop coincident with the testing of the polio vaccine (on about 1,800,000 children, a large chunck of the target population.)
Who all have mandatory, without-a-religious-exemption programs of vaccination for school children...
hummmm...
That's what forums are for. Could be worse, you could be ignored :~D
They pulled off the vaccine because smallpox was eradicated. Thus the risks of catching the disease were smaller than the risks of the adverse reaction from the vaccine...
"Objectively it would appear that as you say "they still have sex" AND the promoters of the vaccine are at a minimum condoning if not promoting such sexual activity among minors by NOT specifically pointing out the sexual activity transmission aspect inherent to HPV..."
That's a stretch. A big one...
"But to that family whose child was the 1 in 140,000, it's 1 in 1 for them... "
That's considered acceptable loss for alot of people on this thread. In fact, they would go ahead and require forced vaccinations even if they knew that it would kill some people. And they would brag about how moral their decision was.
As they say, "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few".
Well, if his children are in any contact with other children, then they are a vector of infection... They remain so when in college ...
**
Again, you missed the point, Alama. Or do you not understand how vaccination works?
Try to concentrate now.
If this person's child is not vaccinated, that child may, indeed be infected. But, since the other children are vaccinated, even a sick, unvaccinated child will not infect them.
"There's a false argument in this thread between the people who hate all vaccines (which I disagree with) and the people who thing all vaccines should be given to everybody whether it makes sense or not."
Everything is always either completely black or completely white on these threads. That's not the truth of the situation, though.
Vaccines can CAUSE encephalitis.
The word vaccination didn't exist back then. Anyway the root word is the Latin vacca meaning "cow". The original meaning of vaccination was to inoculate against smallpox using the cowpox virus. That technique was not developed till a couple of decades after the Revolutionary war. George Washington had his troops inoculated using the much more dangerous method called variolination which used smallpox scabs from people who had light cases of smallpox to inoculate others through lesions made on the skin. This resulted in a usually milder case of smallpox than normally occurred when the infection starts in the respiratory tract. The variolination had about a 1% mortality rate which was still much better than getting smallpox. It also had the drawback that it was possible to transmit smallpox to anyone coming in contact with someone who never been variolinated or had smallpox. Because of the risk of spreading smallpox, people who were variolinated had to quarantined till they built up an immunity and were no longer contagious. George Washington himself was variolinated as a young man during a visit to a Carribean island.
Unless it is caused by a vaccine, of course.
Then nobody cares.
Nope, that is not true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.