Posted on 06/16/2006 5:05:55 PM PDT by ChessExpert
“As he turned to assault the next bunker an NVA machine gun opened up and he was mortally wounded. Captain Sosa-Camejo's valorous action and devotion to duty are in keeping with the highest traditions of the military service and reflect great credit upon himself, his unit, and the United States Army."
From his limousine Michael Moore sneers at this Cuban-American and his Band of Brothers as wimps and crybabies "with a yellow stripe down their backs."
Maybe I'm biased, but nothing – absolutely nothing – Ann Coulter has said about Murtha, Kerry or McClellan strikes me as remotely comparable in vileness, cowardice and rank stupidity as Michael Moore's blanket calumny against some of the bravest men of the 20th century.”
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Requested ping
Ah, those damn Anti-Coulter "hate" sites (you sound like a liberal already!) But of course it's OKAY to post stuff from anti-Michael Moore "hate sites" on FreeRepublic, because when Moore spews his lies, HE'S a liberal instead of a conservative.
How dare those "hate sites" post people's ACTUAL STATEMENTS against them.
Does the RNC pay benefits? You're the got "It's okay to say whatever you want if you have an "R" next to your name" line down good.
Has John Roberts been voting just like Justice Souter lately? He certainly MUST BE, because Saint Ann is infallible. If she SAYS he"s Souter, he IS!
From:
Stop making excuses for Muslim extremists
Mark Steyn
http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com |
....
Speaking as a macho hunter and an icy loner myself, I'm beginning to think the media would be better off turning their psychological profilers loose on America's newsrooms. Take, for example, the Times' star columnist Frank Rich. Within a few weeks of September 11th, he was berating John Ashcroft, the Attorney-General, for not rounding up America's "home-grown Talibans" -- the religious right, members of "the Second Amendment cult" and "the anti-abortion terrorist movement." In a column entitled "How To Lose A War" last October - i.e., during the Afghan campaign -- he mocked the Administration for not consulting with abortion clinics, who had a lot of experience dealing with "terrorists."
...
0/2 so far
http://www.sullivan-county.com/id3/excuses.htm
You are accusing Coulter of plagiarizing from her own columns. (HC&M is a compendium of Coulter's columns.)
You are insane.
And you Coulter bashers who troll every thread now are just pathetic.
You must be being paid.
I wonder if the Coulter fanatics would celebrate the low-brow "hyperbole," as they like to call it, coming out of President Bush's and Vice President Cheney's mouths?
If not, why not.
I can say with unmoveable certainty that my answer would be a resounding NO.
The Dems have lost ground, and votes, year after year for wallowing in the gutter so anyone who champions the notion that Republicans should get down and dirty in the sewage isn't thinking it through.
Therefore, Muslims are evil and we must bomb all their countries and convent them to Christianity. EXCEPT the one Ann dated.
"Has John Roberts been voting just like Justice Souter lately? He certainly MUST BE, because Saint Ann is infallible. If she SAYS he"s Souter, he IS!"
Apparently that is one of the talking points Soros and Media Matter is passing out to you guys.
Coulter wrote a column in which she stated it was dangerous to put a guy on the Supreme Court we know nothing about. The last time that happened, we got Souter.
She wanted to know what was wrong with appointed a clear and obvious conservative.
She didn't say Roberts would turn out like Souter. But that it was a risk, since everyone had been certain Souter (who was an unknown) would turn out to be very conservative.
You are a liar. And you are trolling in every since of the word.
The only question is why? What's your agenda? Is it for money or are you a true believer (in the DNC, I mean)?
Michael Chapman was a well known conservative.
He sued Ann for obvious reasons.
Anyone that looks at that case knows Ann took his writings and used it in her book and didn't give him credit.
The part that gets me.
Ann denied she even knew Chapman.
Thats looking pretty bad considering they were going to editorial meetings every week at Human Events.
"The Confederacy had nothing to do with race."
"...claims the civil war had nothing to do with race conditions..." .
Partly true.
When the war started Lincoln himself said it was about preserving the Union and only,ONLY after several bloody battles in the middle of the war did it become about ending slavery and thus the Emancipation Proclaimation. Even that was illusionary because it only freed thoses slaves NOT in the Union(kentucky, Maryland and Deleware slaves remained slaves)
And until the 14th amend these slaves remained so. Even as the war ended.
"I wonder if the Coulter fanatics would celebrate the low-brow "hyperbole," as they like to call it, coming out of President Bush's and Vice President Cheney's mouths?
If not, why not."
Er, Bush and Cheney were elected to represent the American people. All of them.
Coulter is a pundit.
It's not really too complicated to most of us.
The case at that time offered by the government was entirely circumstantial this is what Bruce Ramsey believed.
MAYBE she should have pointed out that Bruce Ramsey latter with other evidence believed she was a spy. But that is not what Ann was getting at all, she was pointing out his thinking in this part of the case ONLY. Forget the rest of the case, it is NOT important at all.
In other words Ann was right on target and it went right over your head.
How about Ann claiming that Canada sent troops to Vietnam.
When they never sent any troops to Vietnam.
The worst part about this, when it was proven that Canada didn't sent troops.
Ann still cant admit she was wrong.
"Michael Chapman was a well known conservative.
He sued Ann for obvious reasons.
Anyone that looks at that case knows Ann took his writings and used it in her book and didn't give him credit.
The part that gets me.
Ann denied she even knew Chapman.
Thats looking pretty bad considering they were going to editorial meetings every week at Human Events."
You are hilarious.
Even the most determined intern at Media Matters has given up trying to promote this laugh fest. (Or are you new there?)
Coulter's words appeared in her columns at Human Events over her byline.
How is that "suit" working out, anyway. LOL
Undoubtedly. Drive-bys just can't stand it that someone like Ann has not only stood up to them but talks back and makes them look like the fools that they really are. They simply are not used to that. And to think that this same person has a book on the NYT(the driveby bible) best seller list and it's number One must haunt them and give them nightmares like this chauffeur from seattle.
Learn to read. Or are you only paid by the posted word.
This has been addressed many times on this thread.
And, yes, Canada did send troops to Vietnam in 1973.
But, no, AC was probably not thinking of that (though it might have been what caused her mistake).
And yes, the transcript shows that she realized she might have been wrong.
Not quite a lie.
But pretending it is a lie--is a lie. Congrats, you defender of the truth~
So it would indeed concern you if President Bush or VP Cheney had uttered the same words Ann did. Thank you for your candor.
For Moore, yes, but at a time like this we need Ann to stay right here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.