Pay no attention to those lights on the dash, and the strange noises. Just keep going. It doesn't fail, until you know it's going to fail. What you don't know, can't hurt you.
Posted on 06/22/2006 3:46:06 PM PDT by NYer
LAS VEGAS, June 22, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The name of Christ is so offensive to modern secular ears that Clark County School District officials, who knew it was coming, cut off the microphone during a valedictorian address before they or anyone else could hear it.
Brittany McComb is a Christian and a top student graduating from Foothill High. She knew that her valedictorian address would probably be cut short, but was determined to go ahead and mention the one name that is for her above every other name.
"I went through four years of school at Foothill and they taught me logic and they taught me freedom of speech," McComb stated. "God's the biggest part of my life. Just like other valedictorians thank their parents, I wanted to thank my lord and saviour."
The 400 plus graduates and guests gathered at a Las Vegas casino for the ceremony booed and jeered after McComb’s speech was cut short.
McComb was required to vet her speech before the graduation ceremony with Foothill administrators. This, says the school, is standard practice before speeches are read. The school officials then removed all Biblical references and the single mention of the name of Jesus Christ.
McComb, who graduated with a 4.7 grade point average, was warned that if she deviated from the approved text, she could be cut off; but she saw it as a matter of freedom of speech.
“People aren't stupid and they know we have freedom of speech and the district wasn't advocating my ideas,” McComb said. “Those are my opinions.”
“It's what I believe.”
The school district’s legal counsel, Bill Hoffman, said that McComb's words counted as preaching. He told media, “We review the speeches and tell them they may not proselytize.”
McComb said she was not surprised by the censorship. “Even in the Bible it says that the name of Jesus will be hated.”
“But the thing is, it is freedom of speech, so I was upset,” McComb said on the “Jay Sekulow Live!” radio program on June 20. “I was really leery about having to defy authority.... It took me a while, but I answer to a higher authority and it's my freedom of speech, and I had to come to terms with that.”
The American Civil Liberties Union, becoming notorious for its secularist zealotry in cases of public expression of religious belief, praised the school’s decision saying, “It's important for people to understand that a student was given a school-sponsored forum by a school, and therefore, in essence, it was a school-sponsored speech.”
Not so, says a Constitutional lawyer and freedom of speech activist. Mat Staver, founder and chairman of the Florida-based pro-family legal organization Liberty Counsel, said McComb should take the school district to court.
“I think this is one of the most outrageous examples of censorship at graduation that I've seen,” Staver said to Agape Press. “For school officials to literally be standing by the switch at the mixing board and cut the microphone on a student, simply because that student mentions God or Jesus, is just unbelievable.”
A writer in the Conservative Voice, Ben Shapiro, responded, “Let's assume the school district, by allowing McComb's speech, would have been promoting her message. Here's the question: So what?”
“There is no right to be free from public expression of religion,” Ben Shapiro wrote, “but there is a Constitutionally protected right to free exercise of religion … it is none of the school district's business whether she chooses to invoke God, Jesus or Zeus (though history indicates that the ACLU would fight for her right to invoke Zeus).”
The Constitution of the US, says Shapiro, prohibits the establishment of a state religion such as the Anglican Church in Britain, but was never intended to suppress the right to freedom of religious expression.
See MSNBC's interview with Brittany McComb:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13461308/
This is true. If she said she'd stick to their script, then changed her mind, that's not lying. It would however mean that she failed to keep her word. Even if she failed to keep her word, which in this instance would be understandable, it doesn't negate the fact that the school was wrong, on many levels.
Agreed.
I wondered why the scarecrow was looking so haggard.
"Even if she said it, it isn't a lie to change one's mind. "
I visit Frankenstein's office every day.
How many times HAS that happened where a speaker has "changed" his/her mind suddenly and has spoken about something else? I would say too many to count.
"You disagree with the content of the post but instead of expressing the disagreement you make a lame attempt to ridicule me. My response was perhaps too tempered."
I "make a lame attempt to 'ridicule' you." You said F-U.
I think there's a difference there.
5,847,498,657,269,104,387
It is not a moral failing to change one's mind and to decline to honor an unjust demand. This is a demand that neither the school nor the ACLU was morally justified in making. Their position is rendered more untenable by the element of coercion they brought to it.
For similar reasons there are, in the law, certain agreements the law simply will not grant the dignity of being called a contract, and will not enforce. This is such an agreement.
Interesting post.
Oops. I missed one. Make that 5,847,498,657,269,104,388.
5,847,498,657,269,104,387
Oh crap, I forgot you had that golf counter handy!
Oops. I missed one. Make that 5,847,498,657,269,104,388.
(Are you sure you aren't posting my golf score???)
"Their position is rendered more untenable by the element of coercion they brought to it."
Or it was just plain stupid.
Oh wait. I think that's the mileage on my car. Nevermind!
Oh wait. I think that's the mileage on my car. Nevermind!
THAT'S a GOOD THING!! What's your secret?
No, I think that was the diameter of my ever-expanding spare tire.
That's what it all boils down to. Whether she agreed to it or not is irrelevant. Even if she agreed to it, knowing full well that she was lying at the time, this is a demand that neither the school nor the ACLU was morally justified in making.
I don't believe she lied. I don't believe she agreed to their script. But it makes no difference one way or the other. The fact remains, it was an unreasonable (not to mention unconstitutional) demand.
Pay no attention to those lights on the dash, and the strange noises. Just keep going. It doesn't fail, until you know it's going to fail. What you don't know, can't hurt you.
Durned alien technology I think. You were the lurker around the X-files, weren't you!!? Be careful, you could be wanted for Mulder.
I'm in
I didn't say F-U. I asked you if you could spell it. Too bad you, with that sense of humor you're so proud of, missed that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.