Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AP INCORRECTLY CLAIMS SCIENTISTS PRAISE GORE’S MOVIE
Us Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works ^ | June 27, 2006 | Majority Press Release MARC MORANO 202-224-5762, MATT DEMPSEY 202-224-9797

Posted on 06/27/2006 5:05:13 PM PDT by fuyb

The June 27, 2006 Associated Press (AP) article titled “Scientists OK Gore’s Movie for Accuracy” by Seth Borenstein raises some serious questions about AP’s bias and methodology.

AP chose to ignore the scores of scientists who have harshly criticized the science presented in former Vice President Al Gore’s movie “An Inconvenient Truth.”

In the interest of full disclosure, the AP should release the names of the “more than 100 top climate researchers” they attempted to contact to review “An Inconvenient Truth.” AP should also name all 19 scientists who gave Gore “five stars for accuracy.” AP claims 19 scientists viewed Gore’s movie, but it only quotes five of them in its article. AP should also release the names of the so-called scientific “skeptics” they claim to have contacted.

The AP article quotes Robert Correll, the chairman of the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment group. It appears from the article that Correll has a personal relationship with Gore, having viewed the film at a private screening at the invitation of the former Vice President. In addition, Correll’s reported links as an “affiliate” of a Washington, D.C.-based consulting firm that provides “expert testimony” in trials and his reported sponsorship by the left-leaning Packard Foundation, were not disclosed by AP. See http://www.junkscience.com/feb06.htm

The AP also chose to ignore Gore’s reliance on the now-discredited “hockey stick” by Dr. Michael Mann, which claims that temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere remained relatively stable over 900 years, then spiked upward in the 20th century, and that the 1990’s were the warmest decade in at least 1000 years. Last week’s National Academy of Sciences report dispelled Mann’s often cited claims by reaffirming the existence of both the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age. See Senator Inhofe’s statement on the broken “Hockey Stick.”

Gore’s claim that global warming is causing the snows of Mt. Kilimanjaro to disappear has also been debunked by scientific reports. For example, a 2004 study in the journal Nature makes clear that Kilimanjaro is experiencing less snowfall because there’s less moisture in the air due to deforestation around Kilimanjaro.

Here is a sampling of the views of some of the scientific critics of Gore:

Professor Bob Carter, of the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University in Australia, on Gore’s film:

"Gore's circumstantial arguments are so weak that they are pathetic. It is simply incredible that they, and his film, are commanding public attention."

"The man is an embarrassment to US science and its many fine practitioners, a lot of whom know (but feel unable to state publicly) that his propaganda crusade is mostly based on junk science." – Bob Carter as quoted in the Canadian Free Press, June 12, 2006

Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT, wrote:

“A general characteristic of Mr. Gore's approach is to assiduously ignore the fact that the earth and its climate are dynamic; they are always changing even without any external forcing. To treat all change as something to fear is bad enough; to do so in order to exploit that fear is much worse.” - Lindzen wrote in an op-ed in the June 26, 2006 Wall Street Journal

Gore’s film also cites a review of scientific literature by the journal Science which claimed 100% consensus on global warming, but Lindzen pointed out the study was flat out incorrect.

“…A study in the journal Science by the social scientist Nancy Oreskes claimed that a search of the ISI Web of Knowledge Database for the years 1993 to 2003 under the key words "global climate change" produced 928 articles, all of whose abstracts supported what she referred to as the consensus view. A British social scientist, Benny Peiser, checked her procedure and found that only 913 of the 928 articles had abstracts at all, and that only 13 of the remaining 913 explicitly endorsed the so-called consensus view. Several actually opposed it.”- Lindzen wrote in an op-ed in the June 26, 2006 Wall Street Journal.

Roy Spencer, principal research scientist for the University of Alabama in Huntsville, wrote an open letter to Gore criticizing his presentation of climate science in the film:

“…Temperature measurements in the arctic suggest that it was just as warm there in the 1930's...before most greenhouse gas emissions. Don't you ever wonder whether sea ice concentrations back then were low, too?”- Roy Spencer wrote in a May 25, 2006 column.

Former University of Winnipeg climatology professor Dr. Tim Ball reacted to Gore’s claim that there has been a sharp drop-off in the thickness of the Arctic ice cap since 1970.

"The survey that Gore cites was a single transect across one part of the Arctic basin in the month of October during the 1960s when we were in the middle of the cooling period. The 1990 runs were done in the warmer month of September, using a wholly different technology,” –Tim Ball said, according to the Canadian Free Press.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: algore; associatedpressbias; bias; bs; climatechange; globalhotair; globalwarming; gore; inconvenienttruth; mediabias; totalbs

1 posted on 06/27/2006 5:05:14 PM PDT by fuyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fuyb
What an unexpected surprise! I thought AP -- and Seth Borenstein -- was going to get away with that!
2 posted on 06/27/2006 5:11:49 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (New popular baby names for daughters of liberals: Fallujah, Haditha, Murtha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuyb
Earlier thread today:

Scientists OK Gore's movie for accuracy [barf alert]

3 posted on 06/27/2006 5:13:27 PM PDT by CedarDave (When a soldier dies, a protester gloats, a family cries, an Iraqi votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuyb

AP may be incorrect from your point of view and from the point of view of real scientists, but from their point of view (tell a lie big enough and long enough...) they were right on. That's how it's done at AP and other old media.


4 posted on 06/27/2006 5:47:41 PM PDT by lancer (If you are not with us, you are against us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuyb

Thank you. That's what I thought.


5 posted on 06/27/2006 5:48:35 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (NUTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuyb

An editorial in yesterday's Wall Street Journal by Richard Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT, slammed Gore yesterday, as well as the lazy MSM and "scientists" who don't bother to understand the science.

A great quote:

"A general characteristic of Mr. Gore's approach is to assiduously ignore the fact that the earth and its climate are dynamic; they are always changing even without any external forcing. To treat all change as something to fear is bad enough; to do so in order to exploit that fear is much worse. Regardless, these items are clearly not issues over which debate is ended -- at least not in terms of the actual science...."


6 posted on 06/27/2006 5:52:46 PM PDT by Zebra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuyb
What a bunch of lies! In fact, they are saying the opposite, thinking Gore is a nut or worse, using this for political purposes!
7 posted on 06/27/2006 5:54:43 PM PDT by ladyinred (The NYTimes, hang 'em high!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuyb

Looks like Associated Press (AP) reporting is definately NOT ... "Inconvenient Truths”, but are, "Convenient Falshoods".


8 posted on 06/27/2006 6:06:16 PM PDT by moonman (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...

Media Schadenfreude and Media Shenanigans PING


9 posted on 06/27/2006 6:49:24 PM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuyb

It is funny that the same Environmentalists into criticizing anyone who disagrees with Gore and labels them, instantly, as people with ties to oil companies, follow in line with a politician who is not a scientist for gosh sakes who also happens to have large oil ties in his name.


10 posted on 06/27/2006 7:05:08 PM PDT by Merta (I am a Neo-Con, Zionist, Semi-Libertarian, Semi-Rockefeller Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuyb

The AP's a liberal whore.


11 posted on 06/27/2006 7:11:59 PM PDT by GOPJ (Team Bush: STOP begging the NYT with your hat in hand. Arrest them when they commit treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuyb

;^)

12 posted on 06/27/2006 8:54:50 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Another: Climate experts: Gore's movie gets the science right (bogus sampling alert)
13 posted on 06/27/2006 8:57:54 PM PDT by ForGod'sSake (ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fuyb
"To treat all change as something to fear is bad enough; to do so in order to exploit that fear is much worse.”

Al Gore is a two-bit, ham-handed, fear-mongering demagogue. The whole "will Gore run?" issue is such a laugh...he's already running, and his constituents have paid him almost $10 million to watch a campaign commercial. Not a lot of money by Hollywood standards, but it's pretty clever, charging people admission for a commercial.

14 posted on 06/28/2006 9:22:06 AM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("No one cried when Clinton spied." -Crosslake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson