Evos always fail to produce evidence to support their claim that 'leg evolution' is the result of 'gene duplication' and congratulate themselves when they are able to turn the requirement for evidence around on their opponent.
That's not difficult to do. It's almost a basic debating lesson. It is merely a function of where you draw the line. It is no surprise that evos draw the line after their claim and before mine.
What's difficult is to produce evidence to support the initial claim, which is still lacking.
I suppose it works to keep the little evos deceived, however.
Does this mean you can't defend the specific claim you made regarding gene duplication in "leg development genes?"