The following is incomplete:
"To claim - to assert, as you have done - with absolutely no factual basis that the multitude of evidenciary lines are interpreted says much more about your bias than it could possibly about the bias of scientists."
It should read:
To claim - to assert, as you have done - with absolutely no factual basis that the multitude of evidenciary lines are interpreted with an unfounded bias says much more about your bias than it could possibly about the bias of scientists.
Well now, that depends on whose definition of 'unfounded' we use now doesn't it?
Metaphysical all the way.