Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ditto
It is a reforestation plan, I own timber property there and have planted over 1,600 trees. Unfortunately, farmland is not being converted to hardwood forests. The plan is almost entirely used for existing forests that have been over-harvested and are being reforested with red and white oak, walnuts, and other hardwoods.

Nothing holds soil and water better, slows down the wind, protects cities, roads and homesteads better than trees from the effects of dust storms, rain, wind, blizzards, etc.

That's my point, we need more trees, everywhere.

There certainly were many trees in all the coulees and valleys and in the open plains. There was very little of the classical hardwood forests of the eastern midwest. The sparse trees there were critical to the prairie ecosystem and their loss was the doom of those homesteaders. Drive through Sisseton, S Dakota to Williston, N Dakota as I have many times and see all the trees that have regrown, obviously they were not reseeded and none are over 50 years old. The prairie has largely healed itself after the starving homesteaders who cut down the few trees there, up and left.

95 posted on 07/06/2006 4:16:05 PM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: gandalftb

Back to BS headed toward more of the same.


109 posted on 07/06/2006 8:54:58 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson