Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

From what size predator, would a wooly mammoth have needed to evolve an ability to hide?


5 posted on 07/06/2006 1:02:37 PM PDT by patton (LGOPs = head toward the noise, kill anyone not dressed like you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: patton

I think early man hunted them, IIRC.


6 posted on 07/06/2006 1:08:22 PM PDT by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: patton
From what size predator, would a wooly mammoth have needed to evolve an ability to hide?

From that largest and most voracious of all predators, global cooling. Those with the lighter fur did better at the glacier edge while the darker furred animals roamed in warmer climes. /total conjecture

7 posted on 07/06/2006 1:17:06 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("I'm all in favor of a dignified retirement: Why not try it on Kerry as a pilot program?" M. Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: patton
Ebola's on the small side...

Then there are the animals that attack in packs. Get inside, and under the 12ft+ tusks, and it was probably
vulnerable, especially from *all* sides. I'm thinking hyenas, coyotes, etc.

8 posted on 07/06/2006 1:18:08 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: patton

"From what size predator, would a wooly mammoth have needed to evolve an ability to hide?

"

Uh, humans and dire wolves and saber-toothed tigers, perhaps. Humans were the most dangerous predator of the wooly mammoth, though.


10 posted on 07/06/2006 1:19:45 PM PDT by MineralMan (non-evangelical atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson