Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Brightside

If the poor make zero and everybody else's income goes up, the income gap widens. Duh. Since zero is zero, the only way to narrow the income gap is for everybody else to make less than before. And the Times thinks that would be a good thing?


16 posted on 07/11/2006 5:19:03 PM PDT by AConnecticutYankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Txsleuth
if you feel there is nothing new here...then you don't have to stay on this thread.

Thanks, but you're late. I'm over here.

24 posted on 07/11/2006 5:30:41 PM PDT by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: AConnecticutYankee

Why do they bore us? They should just write:

We want to take your money and re-distribute it to the "poor" because we feel guilty about going to cocktail parties in the Hamptons.

That sums up every NY Times editorial for the last 40 years.


29 posted on 07/11/2006 5:44:15 PM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: AConnecticutYankee
narrow the income gap is for everybody else to make less than before. And the Times thinks that would be a good thing?

Well everyone else just not them. Marxists always thing that best thing in life is for everyone else to be equally miserable, then it is "Fair". Notice none of the Junk Media Editors types ever give ANY of their ill gotten over inflated salaries back.

47 posted on 07/11/2006 7:56:07 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Fire Murtha Now! Spread the word. Support Diana Irey. http://www.irey.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson