There is not the slightest implication in the original text that forcible intercourse is at issue.
I have never heard anyone make that claim before.
But even should I concede your point, what about the genocide?
What about instructing the army to keep virgin girls as spoils of war? What about being required to marry rdead brother's wife? What about slavery.
Jehovah's laws are full of things which we will rightly reject today.