NO JUSTICE - NO PEAS!
Posted on 07/26/2006 9:36:40 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - A federal appeals court on Wednesday temporarily delayed a Justice Department bribery investigation of a Louisiana congressman while he challenges the legality of an unprecedented FBI raid on his Capitol Hill office.
The decision by two members of a three-judge panel means the Justice Department cannot begin a review set to begin Wednesday of more than a dozen computer hard drives, several floppy discs and two boxes of documents seized during a May 20-21 raid on Democratic Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record)'s Rayburn Building office.
"The purpose of this administrative injunction is to give the court sufficient opportunity to consider the merits of the motion for a stay pending appeal and should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits of that motion," wrote Judges Janice Rogers Brown and Thomas B. Griffith of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The identity of the third judge is not known.
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales had set a Wednesday deadline to allow a special review team of prosecutors and FBI agents to begin culling through the evidence seized during the controversial raid on Jefferson's office.
The overnight search — which lasted 18 hours — was part of a 16-month international bribery investigation of Jefferson, who allegedly accepted $100,000 from a telecommunications businessman, $90,000 of which was later recovered in a freezer in the congressman's Louisiana home.
Jefferson's appeal challenges a ruling earlier this month by Chief U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan, who upheld the legality of the raid, saying that barring searches of lawmakers' offices could turn Capitol Hill into "a taxpayer-subsidized sanctuary for crime."
According to a government court filing last week, Jefferson also is under investigation in "at least seven other schemes in which the congressman sought things of value in exchange for his performance of official acts."
Jefferson wants the appellate court to allow him to look at the seized materials before the special review team to determine whether any of the documents fell into the category of legislative privilege.
But the Justice Department opposes allowing a congressman to screen evidence that could be used against him. Instead, the department has agreed to give copies of all the seized materials to Jefferson so he can then raise objections with a judge about their use in the investigation.
In his ruling, Hogan rejected requests from Jefferson and a bipartisan group of congressional leaders to return the seized materials, saying the raid did not violate the Constitution's protections against intimidation of elected officials.
At issue is a constitutional provision known as the speech or debate clause, which protects elected officials from being questioned by the president, a prosecutor or a plaintiff in a lawsuit about their legislative work.
Investigators had held off on reviewing the records because the outcry on Capitol Hill after the raid was loud enough for President Bush to order the solicitor general to take custody of the seized materials until Congress and the Justice Department could work out procedures for future raids on congressional offices.
Jefferson has been under investigation since March 2005 for allegedly using his position to promote the sale of telecommunications equipment and services offered by iGate, a Louisville-based firm, that sought contracts with Nigeria, Ghana and other African nations.
In return for his help, Jefferson allegedly demanded stock and cash payments. Jefferson has not been charged and has denied wrongdoing.
___
On the Net:
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit: http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov
"Dollar Bill" liked to stay busy. His brother, Mose, is involved in a separate scandal in LA. Looks like a minor political crime family is trying to reach the big leagues.
Justice delayed is justice denied!!!!!!!!
He'll be able to drag this out another year at this rate. He must be hoping that the Dims win in November and they'll drop the investigation.
They must take lessons from the Fords.
This guy must really be dirty.......they are sure as hell circling the wagons on this one.
"Will the last honest man leaving Washington, please bring the flag?"
"Justice delayed is justice denied!!!!!!!!"
That only applies to the would be defendant.
The state has no intrinsic right to a quick trial.
I'm not sticking up for this POS, but he has the same rights under the law as anyone else.
Sometimes, tho, you just can't help that is wasn't so.
I thought the sarcasm was obvious.
Sorry. Brain...working....very.....slowly.....today...!
:)
"barring searches of lawmakers' offices could turn Capitol Hill into "a taxpayer-subsidized sanctuary for crime."
Isn't that what Capitol Hill already is...at least the Demonrat branch of it?
Uh, that's what the place already is.
LOL! No, It says: "they shall not be questioned in any other Place",. ANY.
It makes no exceptions -even for Grand Juries. There is no other privilege like it.
"Instead, the department has agreed to give copies of all the seized materials to Jefferson so he can then raise objections with a judge about their use in the investigation. "
Nope, Janice is going to have to make them give the docs to the court or the House to hold while the material is challenged before a judge.
It's amazing what a few thousand will buy, cars, livers, judges!!!
Justice delayed is justice denied!!!!!!!!""
I soooo want vigilantes to come back into vogue.....
The right hand is covering the left...
New Orleans and Louisiana get what they deserve. They voted for the jerk, have not demanded a recall and actually gloat about the fact that he takes bribes. Another "victim of whitey." "Poor black man just trying to do his job."
Makes you want to puke.
NO JUSTICE - NO PEAS!
At least yours is working. Mine is....well......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.