Posted on 08/06/2006 2:14:03 PM PDT by blam
Racial IQ Gap Narrows: Blacks gain 4 to 7 points on whites
Eric Jaffe
A statistical analysis of four national intelligence tests indicates that the difference in scores between blacks and whites decreased by about a third between 1972 and 2002. The findings challenge a century-old argument that the racial gap in performance on IQ tests is primarily genetic and therefore invulnerable to social change, say the researchers who performed the new study.
They examined data that have only recently become available to researchers, says William Dickens of the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. Using test results from a random distribution of people in the United States, he and James R. Flynn of the University of Otago in New Zealand tallied the increases in IQ scores of blacks and whites over 3 decades. Each of the four tests analyzed included two or three groups of people that took the test at different times.
Previous measures of the intelligence gap, which had used localized populations tested only once, found blacks 15 to 18 IQ points lower than whites, Dickens says.
In the new analysis, all four tests reflected a similar gap in 1972 but indicated that blacks have since gained ground in IQ.
"The whole distribution of black cognitive ability is moving up relative to whites," says Dickens. "There's no reason to believe [the gap] isn't going to get more narrow as we move forward and as measures of social equality continue to improve."
Neither increased rates of mixed ancestry nor changes in test content explain the narrowing gap, Dickens and Flynn argue in the October Psychological Science.
Last year, a review by J. Philippe Rushton of the University of Western Ontario in Canada and Arthur Jensen of the University of California, Berkeley concluded that intelligence is determined predominantly by genetics. The researchers argued that the IQ gap had held steady for a century, despite social-equality efforts, and noted that studies of adopted children and twins have attributed 80 percent of the gap to genetics.
The new data, by contrast, instead indicate that environmental factors contribute greatly to IQ scores, says Flynn. "It's exciting to show that the gap isn't written in the stars," he says.
But the new findings contain many holes, Rushton and Jensen maintain in a rebuttal published with the study. For example, Dickens and Flynn "cherry-picked" their results by leaving out four tests that don't support their conclusions, Rushton says.
Dickens answers that the tests that he and Flynn omitted were less reliable than the ones that they included.
A 4-to-7-point closure in the gap would be "truly astounding," says Linda Gottfredson of the Delaware–Johns Hopkins Project for the Study of Intelligence and Society.
However, the conclusion "just doesn't fit" with data showing that in the past 30 years, U.S. black children between the ages of 9 and 17 have approached white children in reading scores but not in science and math, she says. If general intelligence, as measured by IQ tests, were really rising, scores would have increased in all subjects.
A fundamental problem with studies of IQ-test results is that "nobody really knows what intelligence is," says psychometrician Peter H. Schönemann of Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind.
The new findings "won't change that many minds," says Doug Detterman of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, who is editor of the journal Intelligence. More important than measuring a gap, he says, is identifying the specific environmental factors or genes that contribute to intelligence.
If you have a comment on this article that you would like considered for publication in Science News, send it to editors@sciencenews.org. Please include your name and location.
Why bother with this argument? Everybody with a consciousness knows that intelligence potential, like muscle potential, is passed on genetically. Regardless of what you are born with, if you do not exercise the tools they will wither away.
If you have a very doumb kid it's most likely because they were born to a very dumb parent. Whether it is genetic, or out of sheer ignorance and neglect, it is still the responsibility of the parent.
And by the time the schools get them, after 5-6 years, it's likely already too late to develop the tools.
Ha,pushing on the door marked pull!Reminds me of that old Far Side cartoon.Sure do miss Gary Lawson.
My theory is that the high popularity of liberal Democrats among the highly educated arises from the fact that the "real"world is just too harsh for their Utopian idealism.Liberals appeal to the sentiment in the human species that says"things could be perfect if only"....PHD's and the like have lived in the academic world all their lives where this feeling is enabled over and over again.
As for the very poorly educated,it is just gullibility and the belief that the government will"help us".Very dangerous and naive proposition.
Someday I'll have an IQ, and it will be a really high one.
Nobody from DU has ever posted at FR.
Are the blacks getting smarter or are the whites getting dumber?
Since very few American blacks are pure black any more, I wonder how many of the blacks tested have what percentage of white or asian blood in them.
I believe studies have been proposed to assess the IQ levels of blacks while simultaneously evaluating DNA for racial admixture. Didn't go over too well! The Bell Curve showed Asians with the highest IQ, whites next and blacks last. The disappointing thing about the nurture theory is that when children of successful upper middle class blacks are tested, they still have lower scores. I have never seen anything on the test scores on the parents of these black children. I read an article by Charles Murray about 6 months ago in the WSJ. I wish I were as smart as he but I believe I recalled he noted this increase in black IQ but there are several measurements within the IQ system and the most important one (I cannot remember its name) did not seem to be improving in the black children.
For one thing, the bulk of people with postgraduate degrees are professors on university campuses, self-selected for being leftwing dipsh&ts. Hordes of them have degrees in meaningless "specialities" which have no relevance to the world outside their hothouse affirmative action bubbles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.